Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (72)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pucher, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dijkstra, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pucher, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dijkstra, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obesity, Overweight, Underweight
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Health Promotion
Right arrow Health Education
Right arrow Urban Health
Right arrow Other Environment
Promoting Safe Walking and Cycling to Improve Public Health: Lessons From The Netherlands and Germany

John Pucher, PhD and Lewis Dijkstra, PhD

John Pucher is with the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. Lewis Dijkstra is with the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1— Percentage of trips in urban areas made by walking and bicycling in North America and Europe, 1995.

Note. Modal split distributions for different countries are not fully comparable owing to differences in trip definitions, survey methodologies, and urban area boundaries. The distributions given here are intended to show the approximate differences among countries and should not be used for exact comparisons.

Source. Transportation Research Board,29 Table 2–2, p. 30.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2— Percentage of trips in urban areas made by walking and bicycling in the United States, Germany, and The Netherlands, by age group, 1995.

Source. US Department of Transportation,11 German Ministry of Transport,14,15 and Statistics Netherlands.19

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3— Pedestrian and bicycling fatality rates and nonfatal injury rates in the United States, Germany, and The Netherlands, 2000.

Source. US Department of Transportation11,12; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention13; German Institute of Economic Research16; German Federal Statistical Office17; German Federal Traffic Institute18; Statistics Netherlands9; and Dutch Ministry for Transport, Public Works and Water Management.20

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4— Trends in pedestrian and bicycling fatalities in the United States, Germany, and The Netherlands, 1975–2001 (1975 = 100%).

Source. US Department of Transportation12; German Federal Statistical Office17; German Federal Traffic Institute18; Statistics Netherlands19; and Dutch Ministry for Transport, Public Works and Water Management.20

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Public Health Association