Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarlio-Lähteenkorva, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lahelma, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarlio-Lähteenkorva, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lahelma, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obesity, Overweight, Underweight
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
Relative Weight and Income at Different Levels of Socioeconomic Status

Sirpa Sarlio-Lähteenkorva, PhD, Karri Silventoinen, PhD and Eero Lahelma, PhD

The authors are with the Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Finland.



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1—— Women’s age-adjusted annual income, by educational attainment within different BMI groups.

Note. BMI = body mass index; FIM = Finnish marks. Age adjustment was by regression analysis. The youngest age group (25–29 years) was used as the reference category.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2—— Women’s age- and education-adjusted annual income, by occupational class within different BMI groups.

Note. BMI = body mass index; FIM = Finnish marks. Adjustment for age and educational attainment was by regression analysis. The youngest age group (25–29 years) with the highest educational attainment was used as the reference category.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3—— Men’s age-adjusted annual income, by educational attainment within different BMI groups.

Note. BMI = body mass index; FIM = Finnish marks. Age adjustment was by regression analysis; the youngest age group (25–29 years) was used as the reference category.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4—— Men’s age- and education-adjusted annual income, by occupational class within different BMI groups.

Note. BMI = body mass index; FIM = Finnish marks. Adjustment for age and educational attainment was by regression analysis; the youngest age group (25–29 years) with the highest educational attainment was used as the reference category.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Public Health Association