Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reinarman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kaal, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reinarman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kaal, H. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Science
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Surveys
Right arrow Drugs
The Limited Relevance of Drug Policy: Cannabis in Amsterdam and in San Francisco

Craig Reinarman, PhD, Peter D. A. Cohen, PhD and Hendrien L. Kaal, PhD

Craig Reinarman is with the Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Calif. Peter D. A. Cohen and Hendrien L. Kaal are with the Centre for Drug Research, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.



View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1—— Frequency of cannabis use for 4 periods, by city (%).a

Note. FY = first year of regular use (>= once per month); MP = maximum-use period; PY = past year; P3M = past 3 months.

aAll respondents.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2—— Average quantity of cannabis used per month (%).a

Note. FY = first year of regular use (>= once per month); MP = maximum-use period; PY = last year; P3M = past 3 months.

aRespondents who still used at time of survey, for past year and past 3 months.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3—— Intensity of intoxication during typical occasion of cannabis use (%).a

Note. FY = first year of regular use (>= once per month); MP = maximum-use period; PY = past year; P3M = past 3 months.

aRespondents who still used at time of survey, for past year and past 3 months.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4—— Duration of high during a typical occasion of cannabis use (%).a

Note. FY = first year of regular use (>= once per month); MP = maximum-use period; PY = past year; P3M = past 3 months.

aRespondents who still used at time of survey, for past year and past 3 months.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Public Health Association