Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Oct 3, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgenstern, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pandina, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgenstern, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pandina, R. J.
Effectiveness of Intensive Case Management for Substance-Dependent Women Receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

Jon Morgenstern, PhD, Kimberly A. Blanchard, PhD, Barbara S. McCrady, PhD, Katharine H. McVeigh, PhD, Thomas J. Morgan, PsyD and Robert J. Pandina, PhD

Jon Morgenstern and Kimberly A. Blanchard are with the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia University, New York, NY. Barbara S. McCrady, Katharine H. McVeigh, Thomas J. Morgan, and Robert J. Pandina are with the Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1—— Flow of participants through the trial, including recruitment and randomization to treatment and control conditions.

Note. Number of clients screened, screened positive, and excluded for various reasons were estimated by an analysis of a representative 1-year period of screening, because screening records were not available for the entire recruitment period.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2—— Percentage of clients who were abstinent during each month, by intervention condition.

Note. Month "zero" refers to the month preceding the study.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association