Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Aug 29, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neuhauser, L.
Right arrow Articles by Syme, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neuhauser, L.
Right arrow Articles by Syme, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pregnancy
Right arrow Other Maternal and Infant Health
Right arrow Other Child and Adolescent Health
Promoting Prenatal and Early Childhood Health: Evaluation of a Statewide Materials-Based Intervention for Parents

Linda Neuhauser, DrPH, Wendy L. Constantine, BA, Norman A. Constantine, PhD, Karen Sokal-Gutierrez, MD, MPH, Susan K. Obarski, MA, Lacy Clayton, MA, Mona Desai, MPH, Gerald Sumner, PhD and S. Leonard Syme, PhD

Linda Neuhauser, Norman A. Constantine, Karen Sokal-Gutierrez, and S. Leonard Syme are with Community Health and Human Development, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. Wendy L. Constantine is with Research and Evaluation Systems, Layfayette, Calif. Susan K. Obarski is with Obarski Consulting, Los Angeles, Calif. At the time of the study, Lacy Clayton and Mona Desai were with Community Health and Human Development, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, and Gerald Sumner was with the Institute for Social Science Research, University of California, Los Angeles.


Figure 1
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIGURE 1— The original First 5 Kit for New Parents.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIGURE 2— Timeline of data collection among mothers in intervention (who received the Kit for New Parents) and comparison groups: California, October 2000 to May 2002.

aFirst 5 began distributing the Kit for New Parents statewide in November, 2001.

bBecause the original comparison group was recruited 6 months after the intervention group was, there was concern that mothers in the comparison group might receive the kit during the 6-month wait for their 14-month interview, thereby contaminating the findings. Therefore, a new comparison sample of mothers who could be interviewed during the same time period that the intervention mothers had their 14-month follow-up interviews was recruited through a snowball sampling method.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIGURE 3— Knowledge-scale scores among English- and Spanish-speaking mothers in the intervention (who received the Kit for New Parents) and comparison groups, by time of data collection: California, October 2000 to May 2002.

Note. Dotted lines refer to the snowball-sampled comparison group. See "Methods" section for information on knowledge assessment.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIGURE 4— Mothers’ average knowledge-score increases, by composite family use of the Kit for New Parents: California, October 2000 to May 2002.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association