|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
© 2002 American Public Health Association
IMAGES OF HEALTH |
Elizabeth Fee, Jan Lazarus, and Paul Theerman are with the History of Medicine Division, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. Theodore M. Brown is with the Departments of History and of Community and Preventive Medicine at the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Elizabeth Fee, PhD, Building 38, Room 1E21, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894 (e-mail: elizabeth_fee{at}nlm.nih.gov).
AS THE WORLD HEALTH Organization’s just-released World Report on Violence and Health makes abundantly clear, violence by intimate partners is a worldwide problem with major public health implications.1 The American Psychological Association has estimated that 4 million American women experience a serious assault by an intimate partner during an average 12-month period.2 A study of women visiting emergency rooms found that 54% had been threatened or injured by an intimate partner at some time in their lives and that 24% reported having been injured by their current partner.3
This problem is not a novelty of the modern world; its roots go back to the very foundations of so-called civil society, although the expression and extent of violence varies across periods and cultures. In medieval Europe, for example, husbands had the right to "chastise"—that is, physically discipline—their wives, servants, and apprentices, although churches and communities also brought significant pressure to bear against these widespread practices.4–6
In this image from a 1582 print edition of the 13th-century Regimen Sanitatis Salernitanum (Salernitan Regimen of Health), we catch a glimpse of a domestic assault as it was frequently represented in medieval and early modern Europe.7 Here it was assumed that the matter was individual and largely private, the consequence of the hot-tempered "choleric" disposition of an angry and poorly controlled man. Until very recently, domestic violence was largely excluded from public scrutiny. These attitudes have begun to change, a process that the publication of the World Health Organization’s report should help accelerate.
|
 |
Footnotes |
|---|
In honor of Jane Eliot Sewell, historian and friend (1959–2002).
|
References |
|---|
 TOPINTRODUCTION References |
|---|
1. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
2. Issues and Dilemmas in Family Violence: Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996.
3. Abbott J, Johnson R, Koziol-McLain J, Lowenstein SR. Domestic violence against women. Incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. JAMA. 1995;273:1763–1767.
4. Brundage JA. Domestic violence in classical canon law. In: Kaeuper RW, ed. Violence in Medieval Society. Bury St Edmunds, England: Brewer; 2000;183–197.
5. Hanawalt B. Violence in the domestic milieu of late medieval England. In: Kaeuper RW, ed. Violence in Medieval Society. Bury St Edmunds, England: Brewer; 2000;197–214.
6. Salisbury E, Donavin G, Price ML, eds. Domestic Violence in Medieval Texts. Gainesville: University Press of Florida; 2002.
7. Regimen sanitatis salernitanum: Conservandae bonae valetudinis praecepta longe saluberrima, regi Angliae quondam à Doctoribus Scholae Saliturnitanae versibus conscripta. Frankfurt, Germany: Christ. Egenol; 1582.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |