© 2002 American Public Health Association
Lovell A. Jones is with the Department of Gynecologic Oncology and the Center for Research on Minority Health and Janice A. Chilton is with the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Janice A. Chilton, DrPH, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 536, Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: jchilton{at}mdanderson.org).
Despite all the gains that have been made in the area of breast cancer research, African American women suffer disproportionately from the effects of the disease. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among African American women, exceeded only by lung cancer. Improvements in cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates among populations are undoubtedly the outcome of quality research. Therefore, there is a need to identify and discuss issues regarding breast cancer among African American women and to determine whether these issues should be a part of the nation's breast cancer research agenda. This commentary summarizes the results of the Summit Meeting Evaluating Research on Breast Cancer in African American Women, which was held September 811, 2000, in Washington, DC. Listed are priority areas and some of the questions that fueled this 2-day discussion among 130 participants, including health advocates, cancer survivors, and experts representing various areas of cancer research.
THE NATIONAL CANCER Institute, the agency with primary responsibility for conducting research on the prevention, detection, treatment, and control of cancer, has sponsored intensive research that has led to many important discoveries about all aspects of breast cancer.1 However, the advances being made in the area of breast cancer research have not benefited all populations equally.2 The disparity in the rate of breast cancer survival between African American and White women is a decades-old problem.3 Each year, the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including the National Center for Health Statistics, collaborate to produce a "report card" to explain the nation's progress in preventing and controlling cancer in the United States.4,5 The initial report card, issued in 1998, reported the nation's first continuing decline in cancer mortality since national record keeping was instituted in the 1930s.4 The 1998 report also noted, however, the disproportionate breast cancer incidence and mortality rates of African American women compared with White women. The incidence of breast cancer in African American women was continuously increasing, with no decrease in mortality trends.4 African American women also tended to present with a later stage at diagnosis.4 The 2001 report card documents similarly disturbing trends for some ethnic minorities and also indicates that African American women have the highest breast cancer death rates.5 African American women have not beenand clearly are not yetwinning the battle against breast cancer. The United States has worked diligently to recognize and to address what the Institute of Medicine terms the "unequal burden of cancer."2 We now understand, more than ever before, how breast cancer cells become cancerous, how the disease metastasizes, why some types of cancer are more aggressive than others, and why some women suffer more and are less likely to survive.1 Research has led to more breast cancer detection and diagnosis techniques, better supportive care, and improved treatment and survival outcomes for patients.1 Despite all the gains that have been made in clinical, basic, and behavioral research, African American women lag behind, continuing to be disproportionately affected by this disease. This commentary summarizes the focus of the 2-day Summit Meeting Evaluating Research on Breast Cancer in African American Women, which was held September 811, 2000, in Washington, DC. Listed are the predefined priority areas and some of the questions that fueled discussion among health advocates, breast cancer survivors, and more than 130 experts from fields including basic science, oncology, radiology, genetics, public health, epidemiology, and data management. In addition, other predefined priority areas and questions pertaining to African American women were derived from the literature and from a 16-year effort, the Biennial Symposium on Minorities, the Medically Underserved & Cancer, a seminar series for scientific discussion and the dissemination of information related to cancer. Recent breast cancer research efforts have not produced results to effect the necessary benefits for African American women. The results of discussions at the summit and the previous biennial symposia indicate that certain priority areas may need to be addressed as part of the national research agenda with regard to African American women and breast cancer.
In the United States in 2001, an estimated 192 200 new cases of female breast cancer are expected to occur, and an estimated 40 200 women will die of the disease.6 In addition to the impact of breast cancer itself, women and their families must endure the emotional effects imposed by the disease and its treatment, as well as the fear engendered by the continued threat of recurrence.7 Breast cancer crosses all demographic lines, affecting women of all ages, races, ethnic groups, socioeconomic strata, and geographic locales.1 We have come to understand, however, that women who are older, of African American or Hispanic descent, poor, residing in rural areas, and medically underserved are disproportionately affected by breast cancer.4,5,8,9
Incidence
Mortality In 1998, breast cancer comprised 16.3% of all cases of cancer and accounted for 7.8% of all deaths due to cancer.5 Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death among African American women, exceeded only by lung cancer9; despite the stabilization of mortality rates, breast cancer deaths among African American women are still approximately 28% higher than in White women.9 This difference may be related to later stages of diagnosis in African American women or to a greater likelihood of African American women being diagnosed with estrogen receptor negative tumors or more aggressive tumors, both of which are more difficult to treat.10 The 5-year survival rate for African American women who are diagnosed with breast cancer is 71%, compared with 86% for Whites.12 Questions regarding the course of breast cancer in African American women are still being debated. The presentations and discussions that took place at the summit reinforced the need to address the questions raised so that we can move forward in successfully attacking the disparities that exist.
As evidenced by the data presented in the 1998 report card, the number of deaths from cancer is being reduced measurably.4 The report also suggests, however, that for some populations, progress in some areas will occur slowly.2 Another objective of the summit was to foster among researchers the type of discussion and collaboration that will lead to a better understanding and explanation of the difference in breast cancer rates in this population. The summit was sponsored by the Center for Research on Minority Health at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and cosponsored by the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; the Intercultural Cancer Council; Howard University Cancer Center; the Jean Sindab African American Breast Cancer Project at Columbia University; the Office of the Director, the National Institutes of Health; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; the National Human Genome Research Institute; the Office of Research on Minority Health; the National Institutes of Health; the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Research Foundation; and Y-Me. The objectives of the summit were to address the breast cancer crisis in a "sound, scientific manner" by bringing together scientists, breast cancer advocates, and policymakers to "lay the groundwork" for the development of a breast cancer research agenda. The outcome of this summit will be the development of a set of position papers offering a comprehensive literature review of predefined areas of breast cancer research. Included in the papers are recommendations for addressing the identified gaps. The summit format, a series of general sessions with a status report on "what we know" followed by breakout sessions to allow a discussion of "what we need to know," was organized around issues such as data acquisition, basic science research, treatment, prevention, epidemiology, and psychosocial issues. The following priority areas and predefined questions were discussed.
Unequal Data Predefined questions discussed:
Risk-Assessment Models Predefined questions discussed:
Breast Cancer Genetics Predefined questions discussed:
Breast Cancer Treatment Predefined questions discussed:
Breast Cancer Screening Predefined questions discussed:
Nutrition and Breast Cancer Predefined questions discussed:
Environmental Exposures and Carcinogens Predefined questions discussed:
Although breast cancer research has resulted in significant advances, there is much work to be done to protect women from the threat of this disease.1 Breast cancer is firmly entrenched on the national cancer research agenda because of its enormous impact on our society.1 It is necessary to continue to define priority areas of research relevant to minority women with breast cancer, and to identify, on the basis of expert testimony and input and the literature, other priority areas, such as psychosocial and behavioral issues, survivorship, and quality of life. Focused research will play a key role in improving breast cancer rates and outcomes in minority populations.2 However, many factors must be taken into consideration. For example, efforts to include minority and medically underserved populations in clinical trials and efforts to provide these populations with information need to be addressed to bridge the gap between scientific innovation and improvements in health and health care delivery.2 Forums such as the breast cancer summit and the biennial symposium series are vital in the development of the breast cancer priority areas. It is critical for those who make policy to interact regularly with those who are affected by those policies.26 Otherwise, we simply continue to collect data and identify issues while actually maintaining the status quo with little real progress.26 It is paramount that the gap between discovery and application does not continue to increase for African American women who are currently and who will be affected by breast cancer.
We wish to thank Lisa A. Newman, MD, Wayne State University and Karmanos Cancer Institute, for her help as cosponsor of the Summit Meeting Evaluating Research on Breast Cancer in African American Women and in the development of the summit discussion questions. We also wish to thank Richard A. Hajek, PhD, and Larry Laufman, EdD, for their valuable comments in reviewing this manuscript. Acknowledgment should also be given to the Intercultural Cancer Council (ICC) (www.icc.bcm.tmc.edu) for the valuable work of its members in the development of the ICC's Cancer Fact Sheets, updated through an educational grant from OrthoBiotech. These fact sheets were invaluable in the preparation of this document.
L. A. Jones conceptualized the main and the supporting points from the summit and contributed to the writing of the paper. J. A. Chilton provided background research and wrote the paper. Accepted for publication December 9, 2001.
1. National Cancer Institute: plans and priorities for cancer research. Planning national agendas in disease-specific research. Available at: http://plan2002.cancer.gov/diseaselinks.htm. Accessed July 21, 2001. 2. Haynes AM, Smedley BD, eds. The Unequal Burden of Cancer. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. 3. Long E. Breast cancer in African-American women. Cancer Nurs.1993;16:124.[Medline] 4. Wingo PA, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM, Miller DS, Edwards BK. Cancer incidence and mortality 19731995: a report card for the US. Cancer.1998;82:11971207.[Medline]
5.
Howe HL, Wingo PA, Thun MJ, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends. J Natl Cancer Inst.2001;93:824842. 6. Cancer Facts and Figures 2001. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 2001.
7.
Breast cancer screening for women ages 4049. NIH Consensus Statement 1997, January 2123. J Natl Cancer Inst.1997;89:10151026. 8. Portnoy B. Healthy people in rural America by the year 2000. In: Couto RA, Simpson NK, Harris G, eds. Sowing Seeds in the Mountains: Community-Based Coalitions for Cancer Prevention and Control. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 1994:102119. NIH publication 943779. 9. Cancer Facts and Figures for African Americans 20002001. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 2000. 10. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures for African Americans. Available at: http://cancer.org. Accessed August 8, 2001. 11. Joslyn SA, West MM. Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival. Cancer.2000; 88:114123.[Medline] 12. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Edwards BK, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 19731997. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 2000. 13. Jones LA, Laufman L. Data collection in African American communities: discussion and recommendations. J Registry Manage.1999;26:149152.
14.
Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA. Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst.2001;93:358366.
15.
Gail MH, Costantino JP. Validating and improving models for projecting the absolute risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst.2001;93:334335. 16. Dignam J. Differences in breast cancer prognosis among African American and Caucasian women. CA Cancer J Clin.2000;50:5060.[Abstract] 17. Taber L, Fagerberg G, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Lancet.1985;1:829832.[Medline]
18.
Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the international workshop on screening for breast cancer [commentary]. J Natl Cancer Inst.1993;85:16441656.
19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Self-reported use of mammography among women aged 20. Rimer BK. Mammography use in the US: trends and the impact of interventions. Soc Behav Med.1994;16:317326. 21. Taylor VM, Taplin SH, Urban N, et al. Repeat mammography use among women ages 5075. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.1995;4:409413.[Abstract] 22. Weinberg AD, Cooper HP, Lane M, et al. Screening behaviors and long-term compliance with mammography guidelines in a breast cancer screening program. Am J Prev Med.1997;13:2935.[Medline] 23. Patterson BH, Harlan LC, Block G, Kahle L. Food choices of whites, blacks, and Hispanics: data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. Nutr Cancer.1995;23:105119.[Medline]
24.
Coates RJ, Clark WS, Eley JW, et al. Race, nutritional status, and survival from breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst.1990;82:16841692. 25. Hargreaves MK, Buchowski MS, Hardy RE, et al. Dietary factors and cancers of the breast, endometrium, and ovary: strategies for modifying fat intake in African-American women. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1997;176:S255S264.[Medline] 26. Weinberg A. People need policy and policies need people. In: Hampton JW, Jones LA, Weinberg AD, eds. Cancer: Proceedings of the Intercultural Cancer Council 6th Biennial Symposium on Minorities, the Medically Underserved & Cancer. Vol 8318(suppl). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, for the American Cancer Society; 1998:17011702. This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||