Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Global Health
July 2002, Vol 92, No. 7 | American Journal of Public Health 1055
© 2002 American Public Health Association


LETTER

NAVARRO RESPONDS

Vicente Navarro, MD, PhD, DrPH

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Vicente Navarro, MD, PhD, DrPH, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (e-mail: vnavarro{at}jhsph.edu).

I agree with Hyder's normative statement that equity should indeed be considered desirable in health policy. As Coyne and Hilsenrath indicate, however, such a goal is not universally accepted, as evidenced by the growing health inequalities between and within countries. But Coyne and Hilsenrath are just plain wrong when they justify (at least in part) the existence of those inequalities while indicating that equity is difficult to achieve in heterogeneous societies. Actually, during the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, China, which has more ethnic diversity and a larger population than India, had lesser regional and class health differentials and better health indicators than India, even though its GNP per capita was lower.1

Hyder is right when he calls for evaluating health systems' performance by looking at their impact on health outcomes, but he is wrong in believing that mortality is a good outcome measure of the effectiveness of health care. At least in the developed countries, where most morbidity is chronic, medical care does more caring than curing, and thus its impact on curing and on reducing mortality is small. The overall level of mortality in a country depends on many other interventions besides health care interventions.

Reference

1. Navarro V. Has socialism failed? Int J Health Sev.1992;22:583–601.





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Global Health


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Public Health Association