© 2003 American Public Health Association
Adam Burke is with the Institute for Holistic Healing Studies, Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, Calif. Yim-Yu Wong is with the Department of International Business, College of Business, San Francisco State University. Zoe Clayson is with the Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Adam Burke, PhD, MPH, LAc, Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, CA 94132 (e-mail: aburke{at}sfsu.edu).
In the United States, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is recognized by the National Institutes of Health as an effective complementary and alternative medicine modality, widely used by consumers and growing as a profession.13 Ironically, while TCM is expanding in the United States, it may be contracting in China as a result of dramatic health care reforms and changing cultural values. There is, however, little information in Western literature explicitly delineating the impacts of these forces on TCM. The purpose of this inquiry was to interview a sample of select respondents, particularly individuals from a major Chinese college of traditional medicine, regarding their perceptions of the field. The results provided insight into the survival and assimilation of indigenous health systems in a modern world. In the late 1970s, Deng Xiao Ping introduced elements of the market economy into China. During the 1990s, significant health care reforms were also initiated. These reforms placed a new emphasis on profitability, economic autonomy for health facilities, and decentralization of public health services and contributed to the demise of the rural cooperative medical system.46 These reforms also produced fundamental changes in health care financing, including replacing free universal health care with fee-for-service and private insurance strategies.4,7 This has contributed to increased medical care costs, higher out-of-pocket expenses, growing inequity in access, a reduction of prevention programs in poor areas, and pricing policies that encourage overprescribing drugs and high-tech services.4,7,810 As a significant percentage of all health care delivered in China is in the form of traditional treatments,11 such reforms will invariably affect this ancient healing system as well.
Field interviews of key respondents were conducted to assess the potential impacts of reform. The primary interview site was the Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CUTCM), one of the major traditional medical schools in China. CUTCM is located in Chengdu, a modern city of 10 million people, and the capital of Sichuan Province. Sichuan is well known as a premier region for medicinal herb cultivation and sales. A convenience sample of 14 individuals was selected for their knowledge of TCM and Chinese culture. It included journalists, CUTCM hospital administrators, clinicians, faculty, a graduate of CUTCM who had just completed her bachelors degree and was leaving for graduate public health study in the United States, and a Western student working on his TCM masters degree (n = 14, female 50%, age range 23 to 57 years). Although this was a nonrepresentative sample, with generalizability limitations, these select individuals were able to provide diverse and informed perspectives on this issue. Semistructured 1-hour interviews were conducted during a 2-week period in June 2001. Questions were based on the hypothesized impact of health care reforms on TCM. They included questions on perceived changes in utilization, relationships of such changes to health care reform, and the status of TCM in modern China.
The respondents narratives were content analyzed using a grounded theory approach.12 The following 4 major themes emerged:
1. Structural Changes
2. Modern Values
3. Lifestyle Factors
4. Alternative to Western Medicine
The results of these interviews on TCM parallel the published information on the impact of health reforms on Western health services. Pressures to modernize, Westernize, and compete globally are potentially reducing the cultural significance of TCM. As Chinas population grows, economic disparities widen, and health care costs escalate, this may not be a prudent course. The availability of effective, low-cost traditional medicines may ultimately become a critical resource. It may be wise for China, the United States, and other countries to examine ways to assist and promote their own indigenous health systems. The loss of such systems through modernization and unsupportive health care policies may remove a valuable source of care for individuals who may be culturally and linguistically isolated from conventional services. True pluralism in health care creates a resource that is socially desirable and important to preserve.
This investigation was supported by a Research Infrastructure in Minority Institutions award from the National Center for Research Resources with funding from the Office of Research on Minority Health, National Institutes of Health P20RR11805. Human Participant Protection The protocol was approved by the San Francisco State University committee for the protection of human subjects.
Contributors A. Burke designed the study and conducted the surveys, analyzed the data, and wrote the brief. Y.-Y. Wong contributed to writing of the paper, providing expertise in Chinese economics. Z. Clayson assisted with data analysis and writing of the brief. Accepted for publication August 21, 2002.
1. NIH Consensus Conference. Acupuncture. JAMA.1998;280:15181524.
2. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 19901997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA.1998;280:15691575.
3. Cooper RA, Laud P, Dietrich CL. Current and projected workforce of nonphysician clinicians. JAMA.1998;280:788794. 4. Bloom G, Xingyuan G. Health sector reform: lessons from China. Soc Sci Med.1997;45:351360. 5. Carrin G, Ron A, Hui Y, et al. The reform of the rural cooperative medical system in the Peoples Republic of China: interim experience in 14 pilot counties. Soc Sci Med.1999;48:961972. 6. Wong VC, Chiu SW. Health-care reforms in the Peoples Republic of Chinastrategies and social implications. J Manage Med.1998;12:270286.
7. Hesketh T, Zhu WX. Health in China. The healthcare market. BMJ.1997;314:16161618.
8. Gao J, Tang S, Tolhurst R, Rao K. Changing access to health services in urban China: implications for equity. Health Policy Plann.2001;16:302312. 9. Hu TW, Ong M, Lin ZH, Li E. The effects of economic reform on health insurance and the financial burden for urban workers in China. Health Econ.1999;8:309321.[Medline]
10. Liu X, Liu Y, Chen N. The Chinese experience of hospital price regulation. Health Policy Plann.2000;15:157163.
11. Hesketh T, Zhu WX. Health in China. Traditional Chinese medicine: one country, two systems. BMJ.1997;315:115117. 12. Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Norman D, Yvonna L, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2000:509536. This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||