© 2004 American Public Health Association
Hong-Je Chang, Cheng-Hua Lee, and Chi-Jeng Hsieh are with the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Taipei, Taiwan. Nicole Huang is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md. Yea-Jen Hsu and Yiing-Jenq Chou are with the Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Hong-Jen Chang, 140, Sec 3, Hsin-Yi Rd, Taipei, Taiwan 106 (e-mail: hjchang{at}mail.nhi.gov.tw).
Using interrupted time-series analysis and National Health Insurance data between January 2000 and August 2003, this study assessed the impacts of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic on medical service utilization in Taiwan. At the peak of the SARS epidemic, significant reductions in ambulatory care (23.9%), inpatient care (35.2%), and dental care (16.7%) were observed. Peoples fears of SARS appear to have had strong impacts on access to care. Adverse health outcomes resulting from accessibility barriers posed by the fear of SARS should not be overlooked.
Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), its etiology, transmission routes, treatments, and outcomes have received much research attention.15 SARS has low mortality and morbidity; however, the health consequences of the SARS epidemic are not limited to people who have been infected.6 The potentially serious impact of SARS on peoples accessibility to medical services should not be overlooked.710 However, no study has systematically evaluated the impact of the fear of SARS on the general population. Peoples fears of SARS were mainly caused by its novel, rapid nosocomial transmission, and the vulnerability of hospitals and health care workers. Many wondered whether the fears of SARS among patients and health care workers alike deterred people from seeking care or providers from offering services. Therefore, a critical challenge is to determine how public health agencies should respond to utilization changes and possible accessibility barriers to the general population created by the SARS epidemic. In this study, we aimed to assess how peoples fears of SARS influenced their utilization patterns of medical services in Taiwan.
The SARS epidemic in Taiwan started in mid-March 2003 and lasted for almost 4 months. The epidemic was effectively contained during the initial SARS period (March 14 to April 21, 2003).11 However, multiple clusters of hospital outbreaks among patients and health care workers initially struck at the end of April and extended to May and June, dramatically exacerbating the epidemic. As a result, overwhelming fears of SARS spread over the entire island along with the SARS epidemic. The situation persisted until July 5, when Taiwan was officially removed from the World Health Organizations list of SARS-affected countries.11,12 We retrieved all claims made to the National Health Insurance program between January 1, 2000, and August 31, 2003, including inpatient care, Western medicine ambulatory care, Chinese medicine services, and dental services. An interrupted time-series design was used. Trends for different types of services were analyzed separately to determine whether utilization changes were specific to certain services. The time-series autoregressive-moving average (ARIMA) analysis13 was applied to determine whether the SARS epidemic was significantly associated with changes in medical service utilization rates. Relative differences between observed and ARIMA-predicted values were expressed in percentages. All analyses were performed using SAS for Windows, Version 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) and Stata 8.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, Tex).
Figure 1
Although the responses of medical service expenditures were similar to those of medical service utilization, reductions in utilization were relatively larger. Inpatient services experienced the largest reduction (35.2%), followed by dental services (23.9%) and Western medicine ambulatory services (16.7%) at the peak of the SARS epidemic (Table 1
Over the study period, we observed significant utilization reductions at the peak of the SARS epidemic. Overall, this short-term impact on utilization reductions translated into an approximate $18.8 billion new Taiwan dollars decrease (approximately 6% of the annual National Health Insurance expenditure) in health care expenditure during the SARS epidemic from April 2003 through August 2003. The results strongly suggest that the fears of SARS significantly influenced peoples care-seeking behavior and that this fear seriously compromised their accessibility to quality care. Although all the international attention is focused on the direct causes of SARS, serious health consequences resulting from peoples fears of SARS should not be overlooked. The results presented here could provide public health agencies with a more complete picture of overall health impacts of the SARS epidemic, so that when SARS re-emerges, it can guide public health officials to prevent avoidable health consequences because of the fears people have regarding SARS.
We thank Roger Haesevoets for editing the brief.
Human Participant Protection
Contributors H. J. Chang planned the study and supervised all aspects of its implementation. N. Huang assisted with the study and led the writing. C. H. Lee synthesized analyses and contributed to the writing of the article. C. J. Hsieh assisted with the data management and the study. Y. J. Hsu assisted with the study and analyses. Y. J. Chou planned the study, completed the statistical analysis, and supervised the study implementation. All authors helped to conceptualize ideas, interpret findings, and review drafts of the brief. Accepted for publication November 30, 2003.
1. Guan Y, Zheng BJ, He YQ, et al. Isolation and characterization of viruses related to the SARS coronavirus from animals in southern China. Science. 2003;302:276278. 2. Cinatl J, Morgenstern B, Bauer G, et al. Treatment of SARS with human interferons. Lancet. 2003;362:293294.[Web of Science][Medline] 3. Kuiken T, Fouchier RA, Schutten M, et al. Newly discovered coronavirus as the primary cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;362:263270.[Web of Science][Medline] 4. Donnelly CA, Ghani AC, Leung GM, et al. Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. Lancet. 2003;361:17611766.[Web of Science][Medline]
5. Lipsitch M, Cohen T, Cooper B, et al. Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science. 2003;300:19661970.
6. Emanuel EJ. The lessons of SARS. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:589591. 7. Haines CJ, Chu YW, Chung TK. The effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome on a hospital obstetrics and gynaecology service. BJOG. 2003;110:643645.[Web of Science][Medline]
8. Clark J. Fear of SARS thwarts medical education in Toronto. BMJ. 2003;326:784.
9. Yeoh SC, Lee E, Lee BW, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome: private hospital in Singapore took effective control measures. BMJ. 2003;326:1394.
10. Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003;168:12451251.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe acute respiratory syndromeTaiwan, 2003. JAMA. 2003;289:29302932.
12. Chien LC, Yeh WB, Chang HT. Lessons from Taiwan. CMAJ. 2003;169:277. 13. Box GEP, Jenkins GM. Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, Calif: Holden-Day; 1976. This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||