© 2005 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.044768
Guanmin Chen, Gary A. Smith, Sarah Grim Hostetler, and Huiyun Xiang are with the Center for Injury Research and Policy, Columbus Childrens Hospital and Childrens Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Guanmin Chen is also with the Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Shusong Deng is with the Department of Preventive Medicine, Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, Gangxi, China. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Huiyun Xiang, MD, PhD, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Columbus Childrens Hospital, 700 Childrens Dr, Columbus, OH 43205 (e-mail: xiangh{at}pediatrics.ohio-state.edu).
Objectives. We described nonfatal injuries and calculated injury rates among middle-school and high-school students in Guangxi, China. Methods. Students were selected using multistage randomizing techniques, and nonfatal injuries in 1840 students from February 2002 to January 2003 were monitored with standardized injury forms. Risk factors for injury were identified in multivariate analyses. Results. The annual overall injury rate was 32.3 per 100 students. Boys had a significantly higher injury rate than the girls (34.8 vs 30.3 per 100 students), and a significantly higher proportion of injuries in boys was caused by other students (28.1% vs 19.4%). A higher proportion of injuries in girls (40.7%) occurred at home. For both boys and girls, sports were the most common activities associated with injury. Injuries from falls were the leading cause of injury, and extremities were most frequently injured. Gender, age, ethnicity, and family income levels were identified as significant risk factors for injury in multivariate analyses. Conclusions. Nonfatal injuries in middle-school and high-school students should be recognized as a significant public health concern in China.
Injuries are the leading cause of death and disability for children around the world.14 In addition to lost lives and permanent disabilities, nonfatal injuries in students are associated with serious social and economic consequences, including health care costs, psychological distress in families, missed school days, and parents missed work days.58 Previous studies have estimated that annual injury rates in middle-school and high-school students range from 5 to 50 injuries per 100 students.3,911 One study showed that school-aged athletes had a higher injury rate than nonathletes,12 and another study showed substantial differences in injury rates of adolescents by gender and school year.13 However, the majority of school-related injuries occurred in classrooms or on school playgrounds.3,14,15 Results from several studies among middle-school and high-school students indicate that injury type, cause of injury, injured body part, and location of injury vary by student demographics and family socioeconomic status.1619 An international comparison study of medically attended, nonfatal injuries in adolescents in 24 developed countries across Europe and North America showed a wide range of injury patterns.11 Although epidemiological characteristics of nonfatal injuries in middle-school and high-school students have been well documented in the United States and other developed countries, little has been done in China. We used a large, randomly selected sample of middle-school and high-school students in Baise City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China from February 2002 to January 2003 to conduct a prospective study with the specific aim of investigating nonfatal unintentional injuries. We present results from descriptive epidemiological analyses of nonfatal injuries in this student population with a focus on describing injury characteristics and identifying risk factors for injury.
Study Design This prospective cohort study was designed to monitor nonfatal injuries in middle-school and high-school students in Baise City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China. The schools were selected using multistage randomizing techniques on the basis of the geographical location and the total number of classes of the schools in three districts of Baise City. Once schools were selected, invitations were sent to school principals and nurses via the Baise City Education Bureau. Each school principal reviewed the study design and signed a cooperative agreement approving participation in the study. Consent to participate in the study was obtained from parents of the selected students, and assent was obtained from the students. The students were allowed to withdraw from the study at any time.
Study Subjects
Operational Injury Definition The injury definition criteria, taught during training for the study, were used by school nurses to confirm all injuries. The focus of this study was unintentional injuries; therefore, medically diagnosed child abuse, suicide, and homicide cases were excluded.
Data Collection Injury data were collected and recorded with Injury Surveillance Survey Forms. These forms recorded the following information for each injury: students name and gender, date and time of the injury, cause of the injury, activity when injured, location of the injury, person(s) who caused the injury, body part injured, school days or activities missed because of the injury, and medical advice or treatment received after the injury. A pilot study was conducted with 45 students at one school in December 2001. Feedback from the pilot study was used to finalize the questionnaire and the Injury Surveillance Survey Form. Before the study, all school nurses and teachers of the selected classes received formal training, which was provided by researchers from the School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Statistical Analysis We compared injuries between male and female students. Specific injury characteristics compared included cause of the injury, location of the injury, activity when injured, body part injured, person(s) who caused the injury, medical care received after the injury, and school days or activities missed because of the injury.
We used the
Overall, a total of 1840 of the selected 1855 students completed the study, yielding a 99.2% completion rate. The distribution of student demographics and family characteristics was very similar between the selected sample and the total population of students. A total of 595 students reported nonfatal injuries during the 1-year period, generating an overall annual injury incidence rate of 32.3 per 100 students.
Injury Incidence Rates
Students who were the only child in a family had a significantly higher injury rate than those who had families with more than one child (36.5 vs 27.4 per 100 students; P <.01). There was no significant difference in the injury incidence rate between students whose parents were divorced and those whose parents were married. However, for students with divorced parents, living arrangements had a significant impact on the injury incidence rate. Compared with students who lived with mothers or fathers, those who lived with their grandparents had a significantly lower injury rate (15.0 per 100 students living with grandparents vs 30.8 per 100 students living with mothers and 45.3 per 100 students living with fathers; P =.03). Injury risk was also associated with parents education and household income at a significant level (P <.01).
Overall, approximately one third of students (31.4%) had more than one injury during the study period (Table 2
Injury Characteristics and Outcomes The characteristics of injury by gender are summarized in Table 3
In both male and female students, more than 67% of injuries were to the lower and upper extremities. During the study period, 23.3% of injuries in female students and 30.1% of injuries in male students required outpatient medical treatment, and a small percentage (3.2% of male injuries and 4.5% of female injuries) resulted in hospitalizations. However, approximately 10% of injuries in both male and female students did not receive medical treatment. Approximately half of the injuries (51.2%) caused students to miss 1 to 3 days of school or activities.
Logistic Regression Results
Although both the total number of children in the family and the educational level of the mother were statistically significant risk factors for injury in univariable analyses, these became nonsignificant variables after control for the potential confounding effects of gender, age, and ethnicity (models 2 and 4). However, household monthly income was still significantly associated with injury risk in students in logistic regression analyses. With control for the potential confounding effects of gender, age, ethnicity, and the mothers educational level, the odds of injury among students whose families had a median monthly income of 2000 to 4000 Yuan was 1.42 (95% CI=1.11, 1.81) compared with students whose families had a monthly income of less than 2000 Yuan. The interaction effects among selected variables were evaluated; however, none were significant at P .05, and thus the results are not reported here.
We used a prospective cohort study design to collect information on nonfatal injuries from a large random sample of middle-school and high-school students in China. We found that students who were male, younger, and from an ethnic minority/relatively wealthy family had a higher risk of injury. For both male and female students, sports were the most common injury-related activity, falls were the leading cause of injuries, and extremities were the most frequently injured. Compared with injuries in female students, a significantly higher proportion of injuries in male students was caused by classmates. However, females were more likely than males to be injured at home. We found an overall annual injury rate of 32.3 injuries per 100 students, which is consistent with injury rates of 5 to 50 injuries per 100 students in previous studies.2,3,9,10,12,2427 The lower injury rates found in some of these studies are related to study design and injury definition. For example, two previous studies10,26 used data collected by the US National Health Interview Survey but only estimated injury rates for a 3-month recall period. The study conducted by Radelet et al. showed only sports-related injuries.12 Our study methodology was most comparable with the methodology used in previous studies in Shantou City in the Guandong province9 and in the United States.6 During a 1-year follow-up of 2559 students aged 7 to 16 years, the study by Li et al. showed an injury rate of 37.9 injuries per 100 students.9 Using a similar study design, Lenaway et al. monitored nonfatal injuries among 5518 elementary-school to high-school students and found an injury rate of 9.2 per 100 students.6 An international comparison study of medically attended nonfatal injuries among adolescents across 24 developed countries in Europe and North America showed that the annual injury rate among students aged 11 to 15 years varied from 10 to 47 injuries per 100 students in different countries.11 Comparison of injury rates between different injury studies is challenging for many reasons, including different study periods,10,12 different injury definitions,12 and different data collection systems.1,2 According to King et al., it may be more useful to look at the types of injuries by age group and by gender and the circumstances in which injuries occur.11 Our results regarding the leading cause of injury, activity when injured, location of injury, and body part injured among this school population were strikingly consistent with findings from other studies conducted around the world.2,3,10 Our findings and those of previous studies highlight the importance of prevention of sports-related injuries in injury control and prevention programs that focus on students. Around the world, health professionals and public health agencies advocate physical activity to combat the rising epidemic of childhood obesity.28 However, numerous studies have documented the substantial economic and social impact of injuries related to sports, recreation, and exercise.29,30 Parents and students need to recognize that injuries are not an inevitable part of participation in sports but are predictable and preventable. Middle-school and high-school students can harvest the tremendous benefits of physical activity when they play safely. Physical education teachers and coaches in schools need to be aware of the high risk of injury associated with sports activities and should design age-appropriate activities for students to reduce the risk of injury. The inverse relationship of injury rate and age in our study was different from that found in a previous study.9 Injury rate in the study by Li et al. increased from 18.6 injuries per 100 students for those aged 7 to 9 years to 55.4 injuries per 100 students for those aged 13 to 16 years.9 However, our analysis showed that the injury rate decreased from 41.4 per 100 students aged 11 years to 20.2 per 100 students aged 17 to 18 years. Our results were more consistent with findings from a study conducted in Taiwan3 and from studies conducted among American students.6,7 In Taiwan, students in the ninth grade had the lowest injury rate when compared with students in the seventh and eighth grades. Lenaway et al. also found that American high-school students had a lower injury rate than elementary-school students and middle-school/junior high-school students.6 Differences in injury rate by age are more likely because of changes in student developmental stages and changes in the types of activities in which students participate.31 Analysis of injury rates6 revealed that high-school students were injured more frequently in the gym, middle-school/junior high-school students were injured more frequently on the athletic field, and elementary-school students were injured more frequently on the playground. Our results from multivariate regression analysis also showed that when the confounding effect from other variables was controlled, students aged 14 to 16 years had the highest risk of injury. This might indicate that, in our study, students aged 14 to 16 years participated in different types of activities or had more exposure time to high-risk environments than the students in the other two age groups. Future studies comparing sports/ leisure activities and exposure times to these activities between middle-school and high-school students in China may provide additional useful information. Differences in injury risk and injury patterns in male and female students of different ethnicity in our study might reflect differences in socioeconomic status, social activities, or urban versus rural residence of the students in China. Our findings indicate that minority students had a higher risk of injury than majority students (higher injury rate and OR) and that socioeconomic background has a major impact on injury risk. With regard to gender, more male students than female students in China participate in aggressive sports activities such as football and basketball, whereas female students are more likely to participate in less aggressive activities such as dancing or performing household chores.32 This difference in social activities may explain the significantly higher proportion of sports-related and leisure activity-related injuries among male students in our study. This is also likely to be the reason why a significantly higher proportion of household injuries occurred among female students. Nevertheless, approximately one third of the injuries among both male and female students occurred in schools, and 28.1% of injuries among male students were caused by other children in schools. These findings have implications for injury-prevention initiatives in schools. As suggested by other researchers,3,7,33 schools are social institutions that have a pivotal role in influencing student behaviors as well as academic and social development. Therefore, school administrators are responsible for monitoring the school environment and providing supervision during class breaks and activities after school. We used a prospective study design to monitor nonfatal unintentional injuries among middle-school and high-school students in China. This study design allowed us to calculate injury rates and compare relative injury risk in students. We also controlled for potential confounding effects of selected variables by conducting logistic regression analyses, which were seldom used in other studies.3,6,7,9,33 Finally, compared with other studies, our participant completion rate was very good. Nevertheless, our findings are subject to at least two limitations. First, underreporting by parents or students may have occurred, particularly when they were asked to report injuries that occurred during breaks outside of the school. In China, students usually have a 45-day break in July and August. Some parents/students may not remember an injury or the details of an injury that occurred during the school break. Another limitation is that our study was conducted in one city in China; therefore, findings in our study population may not reflect the injury risk and patterns of injury among the entire middle-school and high-school student population of China. In summary, the results from this large prospective cohort study present an epidemiological overview of characteristics and risk factors for nonfatal unintentional injuries experienced by middle-school and high-school students in Gangxi, China. Our data indicate that the demographics and family characteristics of the students had a significant impact on injury risk and injury patterns among school students. Our findings underscore the importance of injury prevention in schools as well as outside of schools. Nonfatal injuries among middle-school and high-school students should be recognized as a significant public health concern in China.
We thank Drs Yingjia Ma and Qijun Wu at the Department of Preventive Medicine, Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, for assistance with study design and data collection. We also thank teachers at selected middle and high schools for their contributions to the data collection.
Human Participant Protection
Peer Reviewed
Contributors Accepted for publication July 1, 2004.
1. Li P, Li X. Epidemiology study on childhood injury deaths in rural areas of China. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi.1995;33:202205. 2. Bienefeld M, Pickett W, Carr PA. A descriptive study of childhood injuries in Kingston, Ontario, using data from a computerized injury surveillance system. Chronic Dis Can.1996;17:2127.[Medline] 3. Yang CY, Yeh YC, Cheng MF, Lin MC. The incidence of school-related injuries among adolescents in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Am J Prev Med.1998;15:172177.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Rivara FP. Pediatric injury control in 1999: where do we go from here? Pediatrics.1999;103:883888. 5. Feldman W, Woodward CA, Hodgson C, Harsanyi Z, Milner R, Feldman E. Prospective study of school injuries: incidence, types, related factors and initial management. Can Med Assoc J.1983;129:12791283.[Abstract] 6. Lenaway DD, Ambler AG, Beaudoin DE. The epidemiology of school-related injuries: new perspectives. Am J Prev Med.1992;8:193198.[Web of Science][Medline]
7. Sheps SB, Evans GD. Epidemiology of school injuries: a 2-year experience in a municipal health department. Pediatrics.1987;79:6975. 8. Taketa S. Student accidents in Hawaiis public schools. J Sch Health.1984;54:208209.[Web of Science][Medline] 9. Li LP, Wang S, Huang G, Luo JY. A survey on injury incidence in school children in Shantou City, China. Biomed Environ Sci.2003;16:180186.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
10. Overpeck MD, Kotch JB. The effect of US childrens access to care on medical attention for injuries. Am J Public Health.1995;85:402404. 11. King A, Wold B, Tudor-Smith C, Harel Y. The health of youth. A cross-national survey. WHO Re.g., Publ Eur Ser.1996;69:1222.[Medline]
12. Radelet MA, Lephart SM, Rubinstein EN, Myers JB. Survey of the injury rate for children in community sports. Pediatrics.2002;110:e28. 13. Grimmer KA, Jones D, Williams J. Prevalence of adolescent injury from recreational exercise: an Australian perspective. J Adolesc Health.2000;27:266272.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 14. Engstrom K, Laflamme L, Diderichsen F. Equalisation of socioeconomic differences in injury risks at school age? A study of three age cohorts of Swedish children and adolescents. Soc Sci Med.2003;57: 18911899. 15. Pickett W, Garner MJ, Boyce WF, King MA. Gradients in risk for youth injury associated with multiple-risk behaviours: a study of 11,329 Canadian adolescents. Soc Sci Med.2002;55:10551068. 16. Kramer MD, Lightfoot AC, Knight S, Cazier CF, Olson LM. Classroom injuries in Utah public schools. Acad Emerg Med.2003;10:978984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] 17. Junkins EP, Knight S, Lightfoot AC, Cazier CF, Dean JM, Corneli HM. Epidemiology of school injuries in Utah: a population-based study. J Sch Health.1999; 69:409412.[Web of Science][Medline]
18. Turbeville SD, Cowan LD, Asal NR, Owen WL, Anderson MA. Risk factors for injury in middle school football players. Am J Sports Med.2003;31:276281.
19. Messina DF, Farney WC, DeLee JC. The incidence of injury in Texas high school basketball. A prospective study among male and female athletes. Am J Sports Med.1999;27:294299. 20. SPSS base 11.5 application guide. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 2003. 21. Department of Baise Statistics. Social and economic statistics report 2002. Nanning, China: Guanxi Statistics Bureau; 2002. 22. SPSS regression 11.5 regression model. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 2003. 23. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. 7th ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1999. 24. King MA, Pickett W, King AJ. Injury in Canadian youth: a secondary analysis of the 199394 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Survey. Can J Public Health.1998;89:397401.[Web of Science][Medline] 25. Hodgson C, Yacura W, Woodward C, Feldman W, Feldman E. Sequellae of school-related injuries: school and parent perspectives. Can J Public Health.1984;75: 273276.[Web of Science][Medline]
26. Overpeck MD, Jones DH, Trumble AC, Scheidt PC, Bijur PE. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic factors affecting nonfatal medically attended injury rates in US children. Inj Prev.1997;3:272276.
27. Meeuwisse WH, Sellmer R, Hagel BE. Rates and risks of injury during intercollegiate basketball. Am J Sports Med.2003;31:379385. 28. World Health Organization, Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Annual Global "Move for Health" Initiative: A Concept Paper. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services; 2003.
29. Conn JM, Annest JL, Gilchrist J. Sports and recreation related injury episodes in the US population, 199799. Inj Prev.2003;9:117123. 30. Gotsch K, Annest JL, Holmgreen P, Gilchrist J. Nonfatal sports- and recreation-related injuries treated in emergency departmentsUnited States, July 2000June 2001. MMWR.2002;51:736740.[Medline]
31. Scheidt P, Harel Y, Trumble A, Jones D, Overpeck M, Bijur P. The epidemiology of nonfatal injuries among US children and youth. Am J Public Health.1995;85: 932938.
32. Lee MM, Wu-Williams A, Whittemore AS, et al. Comparison of dietary habits, physical activity and body size among Chinese in North America and China. Int J Epidemiol.1994;23:984990. 33. Limbos M, Peek-Asa C. Comparing unintentional and intentional injuries in a school setting. J Sch Health.2003;73:101106.[Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||