|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
© 2007 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.074856
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
At the time this study was conducted, Tamara Dubowitz was with the Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass. Stephanie A. Smith-Warner is with the Nutrition Department, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston. Dolores Acevedo-Garcia and S.V. Subramanian are with the Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston. Karen E. Peterson is with the Department of Nutrition and the Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Tamara Dubowitz, RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 (e-mail: dubowitz{at}rand.org).
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Limited research has examined the association of diet with immigrant status, adjusting for multiple socio-demographic and contextual influences. Among 662 WIC-eligible postpartum women, those who were foreign-born and had lived in the United States for 4 or fewer years consumed 2.5 more fruit and vegetable servings daily than native-born women; this difference diminished with longer US residence. White women consumed 1 serving less than Latinas, and those speaking both English and Spanish at home consumed 1.4 servings more than English-only speakers after adjusting for other covariates.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Latinos are the largest and most rapidly growing minority group in the United States. In 2003, 22.5% of Latinos (9.1 million) were estimated to live below the federal poverty line.1 Nevertheless, Latino immigrants tend to have lower mortality risk, better dietary quality, and lower obesity rates than do nonimmigrant groups of similar socioeconomic status. However, this relative advantage declines with length of US residence.2–7 Factors hypothesized to account for these differences include behavioral characteristics, lifestyle, and social support.2,8–10
Greater fruit and vegetable consumption has been shown to reduce the risk of major causes of mortality and morbidity in the United States, including type II diabetes, heart disease, certain cancers, stroke, and obesity.11–17 For women of childbearing age, optimal dietary intake not only influences nutritional status but also has implications for neonatal and infant development.18
We examined the association of nativity and length of time in the US with fruit and vegetable intake among a multiethnic sample of low-income, postpartum women.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
We used baseline data from surveys that were conducted among low-income women aged 18 to 44 years who resided in the Boston metropolitan area and western Massachusetts. The surveys were conducted in English or Spanish to 679 women who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention for postpartum women that aimed to improve diet and increase physical activity.18,19 We analyzed baseline data from the intervention trial. Participants had a household income that was at or below 185% of the poverty line and were income-eligible for the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)20; nearly all women were enrolled in WIC. The study protocol for the randomized controlled trial was approved by the institutional review boards of participating institutions.
We used a validated, semiquantitative, food-frequency questionnaire21 to assess usual consumption of fruit and vegetables in the previous 4 weeks among low-income women aged 18 to 44 years who resided in the Boston metropolitan area and western Massachusetts.
The questionnaire was shown to be unassociated with racial/ethnic-related self-report bias22 in a multiethnic sample randomly selected from participants in a health promotion trial.23 Prior to our research, members of our team conducted focus groups of Latinos and Blacks to increase the salience of the food-frequency questionnaire among low-income, multiethnic women. Fruits and vegetables that were reported as being "regularly eaten" were added to the questionnaire. Total daily fruit and vegetable servings (excluding french fries) were calculated and summed from 20 questions.
We excluded results from participants that were missing responses to 3 or more questions related to fruits and vegetables, results that reported daily fruit and vegetable intakes of 20 or more servings, and those that reported daily energy intakes of fewer than 2510.4 or 20 920.0 or more kilojoules. The resulting analytic sample was composed of 662 women. We computed mean daily fruit and vegetable servings by sociodemographic and other characteristics for the entire sample and by nativity and adjusted for age. We developed sequential, ordinary least squares regression models of fruit and vegetable intake. We first examined associations with nativity and duration of US residence. In subsequent models we added race/ethnicity and indicators of social support, socioeconomic status, and neighborhood access.
Instrumental and emotional aspects of social support were measured through the subsection of the Medical Outcomes Survey scale, which consists of 8 questions, each answered on a Likert 5-point scale.24 Socioeconomic status was assessed through household income, educational attainment and employment status. Two questions pertained to neighborhood access: one asked whether the respondent had access to more than 2 places to exercise in the neighborhood and the other questioned the amount of time it took respondents to get to the grocery store. The final model incorporated language acculturation and variables that demonstrated statistical significance or were theoretically relevant.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
The mean daily servings by sociodemographic characteristics, social support, and indicators of fruit and vegetable access and availability are shown in Table 1
. More than half of the women were born outside the United States and 67% spoke Spanish as their first or native language. Foreign-born mothers reported 6.3 daily servings of fruit and vegetables, whereas native-born women reported consuming 4 servings.
|
In the final multivariable regression model (Table 2
), the mean daily fruit and vegetable intake was 2.5 servings greater among foreign-born women living 4 or fewer years in the United States, compared with their native-born counterparts. After adjusting for language acculturation, Latinas ate 1 daily serving more than White women. The sequential regression models are shown in Table 2 (models A, B, C, and D). As shown in Table 2, in model A, the initial difference of 0.9 additional servings of fruits and vegetables among foreign-born women who were in the United States for at least 15 years was attenuated once race/ethnicity was added to the regression model (model B). Model C shows that adjusting for all covariates besides that of language acculturation only slightly decreased values of fruit and vegetable intake for most native and foreign-born women (and slightly increased values of fruit and vegetable consumption for foreign-born women in the country for 4 or fewer years). Once language acculturation was included in the model (model D), we observed that fruit and vegetable consumption among foreign-born women who had lived in the United States for 15 or more years was virtually the same as that of native-born women.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
After we adjusted for socioeconomic status, social support, and perceived access and availability of fruits and vegetables, we found that low-income, foreign-born women consumed more fruit and vegetables than did native-born women. Sequential model building showed that differences by nativity were accounted for by length of US residence, Latino race/ethnicity, and language acculturation. This is consistent with the literature on the Latino paradox that relates an erosion of culturally mediated norms and lifestyles to increases in overweight and chronic diseases.2–5 Similarly, national data also showed greater mean intake of fruit and vegetables among Latinas compared with White and Black women.25 The independent association of fruit and vegetable intake with "partial" language acculturation (i.e., speaking both Spanish and English at home) suggests that less linguistic isolation may promote healthy behaviors, perhaps through better access to foods or informational or other resources that promote healthy lifestyles.
Our study, conducted in a diverse WIC-eligible population, also underscores the potential relevance of the immigrant health paradox to US nutritional programs and policies. Nearly 40% of WIC participants in 2004 were of Latino origin.26 Recent recommendations to revise the WIC food packages include provision of fruit and vegetables, which are not currently provided.27 Providing nutrition counseling to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among young Latino families28,29 may depend on understanding the diversity by nativity; acculturation, including duration of US residence; and linguistic isolation.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported generously by the Harvard School of Public Health (grant MCHB 5T76 MC 00001), State of Massachusetts (grant 1 R01 HD37368-01). T. Dubowitz was supported by the University of Pitts-burgh Graduate School of Public Health (grants F31-NS046161-02) and a predoctoral NIH fellowship (grant 5P60MD-000207-04). S.V. Subramanian was supported by the National Institutes of Health Career Developement Award (grant NHLBI-1-K25-HL08-1275).
The authors wish to thank the women who participated in the Just For You Postpartum Intervention Trial.
Human Participant Protection
Our study was conducted with the approval of the human participants committee of the Harvard School of Public Health.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Peer Reviewed
Contributions
T. Dubowitz designed the study, performed the analyses, and wrote the article. S.A. Smith-Warner, D. Acevedo-Garcia, S.V. Subramanian, and K.E. Peterson helped design the study and interpret the findings.
Accepted for publication October 21, 2006.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
1. United States Census Bureau. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2004, Table 3. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-229.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2007.
2. Singh GK, Siahpush M. All-cause and cause-specific mortality of immigrants and native-born in the United States. Am J Public Health.2001;91:392–399.
3. Abrams B, Guendelman S. Nutrient intake of Mexican-American and non-Hispanic White women by reproductive status: results of two national studies. J Am Diet Assoc.1995;95:916–918.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Gordon-Larsen P, Harris KM, Ward DS, Popkin BM. Acculturation and overweight-related behaviors among Hispanic immigrants to the US: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Soc Sci Med.2003;57:2023–2034.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
5. Goel MS, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Wee CC. Obesity among US immigrant subgroups by duration of residence. JAMA.2004;292:2860–2867.
6. Palloni A, Morenoff JD. Interpreting the paradoxical in the Hispanic paradox: demographic and epidemiologic approaches. Ann N Y Acad Sci.2001;954:140–174.[Web of Science][Medline]
7. Vega WA, Amaro H. Latino outlook: good health, uncertain prognosis. Annu Rev Public Health.1994;15: 39–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
8. Morales LS, Lara M, Kington RS, Valdez RO, Escarce JJ. Socioeconomic, cultural, and behavioral factors affecting Hispanic health outcomes. J Health Care Poor Underserved.2002;13:477–503.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
9. Franzini L, Ribble JC, Keddie AM. Understanding the Hispanic paradox. Ethn Dis.2001;11:496–518.[Medline]
10. Lara M, Gamboa C, Kahramanian MI, Morales LS, Bautista DE. Acculturation and Latino Health in the United States: a review of the literature and its sociopolitical context. Annu Rev Public Health.2005;26:367–397.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
11. Serdula MK, Byers T, Mokdad AH, Simoes E, Mendlein JM, Coates RJ. The association between fruit and vegetable intake and chronic disease risk factors. Epidemiology.1996;7:161–165.[Web of Science][Medline]
12. Hung HC, Joshipura KJ, Jiang R, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst.2004;96(21):1577–1584.
13. Joshipura KJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, et al. The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med.2001;134:1106–1114.
14. Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, et al. Diet and lifestyle and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. New Engl J Med.2001;345:790–797.
15. Terry P, Suzuki R, Hu FB, Wolk A. A prospective study of major dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.2001;10: 1281–1285.
16. Fung TT, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rexrode KM, Willett WC, Hu FB. Prospective study of major dietary patterns and stroke risk in women. Stroke.2004;35: 2014–2019.
17. Winkleby MA, Cubbin C. Changing patterns in health behaviors and risk factors related to chronic diseases, 1990–2000. Am J Health Promot.2004;19:19–27.[Web of Science][Medline]
18. Peterson KE, Sorensen G, Pearson M, et al. Design of an intervention to improve dietary and activity patterns among low-income, postpartum women. Health Educ Res.2002;17:531–540.
19. Ebbeling CB, Pearson M, Sorenson G, et al. Conceptualization and development of a theory-based healthful eating and physical activity intervention for postpartum women who are low-income. Health Promot Pract.2007; 8:50–59.
20. US Department of Agriculture. WIC Income Eligibility Guidelines 2003–2004. Available at: http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/howtoapply/incomeguidelines03-04.htm. Accessed July 25, 2007.
21. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol.1985;122:51–65.
22. Hebert JR, Peterson KE, Hurley TG, et al. The effect of social desireability trait on self-reported dietary measures among multi-ethnic female health center employees. Ann Epidemiol.2001;11:417–427.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson KE, et al. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the Treatwell 5-a-Day Study. Am J Public Health 1989;89:54–60.
24. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med.1991;32(6):705–714.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25. Thompson FE, Midthune D, Subar AF, McNeel T, Berrigan D, Kipnis V. Dietary intake estimates in the National Health Interview Survey, 2000: methodology, results, and interpretation. J Am Diet Assoc.2005;105: 352–363.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
26. US Department of Agriculture. WIC Participant and Program Characteristics 2004. Available at: http://www.fns.usda.gov/oane/menu/Published/WIC/FILES/PC2004ExecSum.pdf. Accessed August 17, 2006.
27. Institute of Medicine. WIC Food Packages: Time for a Change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
28. US Department of Agriculture. Fit WIC Programs to Prevent Overweight in Your Community. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture; 2005. Special Nutrition Report Series No. WIC-05-FW. Available at: http://www.fns.usda.gov/oane/menu/Published/WIC/FILES/fitwic.pdf. Accessed August 17, 2006.
29. Crawford PB, Gosliner W, Anderson C, et al. Counseling Latina mothers of preschool children about weight issues: suggestions for a new framework. J Am Diet Assoc.2004;104:387–394.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Gupta, D. Acevedo-Garcia, D. Hemenway, M. R. Decker, A. Raj, and J. G. Silverman Premigration Exposure to Political Violence and Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence Among Immigrant Men in Boston Am J Public Health, March 1, 2009; 99(3): 462 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |