|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2007 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.094235
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Kenneth P. Tercyak is with the Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC. Daniel Rodriguez and Janet Audrain-McGovern are with the Tobacco Use Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Kenneth P. Tercyak, PhD, Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven St NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007 (e-mail: tercyakk{at}georgetown.edu).
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
We explored cigarette smoking prevalence rates in former high school seniors 1 year after graduation and found that among 12th grade never smokers, 25% initiated smoking, and among 12th grade ever smokers, 39% increased their cigarette use. Alcohol use in 12th grade, along with not attending college, were both positively related to smoking progression. Risk for smoking initiation does not end at adolescence, and the public health community must continue tobacco control initiatives throughout adolescence and young adulthood.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
In 2000, lifetime and 30-day prevalence rates of smoking among college students were 53% and 29%, respectively.1 Some young adults become regular smokers for the first time during college2: as many as 37% initiate smoking and 25% progress in their habit.3 Other reports also suggest young adulthood is a time of smoking risk,4–6 but initiation and progression risk factors are unclear. Because risk factor identification is key to tobacco control efforts,7 we explored factors related to change in smoking prevalence among high school seniors 1 year after completion of 12th grade. We assumed that the developmental period of adolescence transitioning into young adulthood remains a period of risk for smoking8,9 and initiation and progression are observable within this period.10,11 We hypothesized that social and behavioral risk factors for initiation and progression could be identified.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Data were collected through a series of investigations of biobehavioral predictors of adolescent and young adult changes in smoking over time: the Georgetown Adolescent Tobacco Research Project and the Adult Longitudinal Outcomes and Health Assessment, whose methods are described elsewhere.12,13 Briefly, a cohort of more than 1100 ninth-grade students was amassed in 1999 and interviewed at least annually in person (1999 to spring 2003) and by telephone (spring 2004 to the present). Annual response rates ranged from 89% to 96%, and the integrity of the cohort and data were high. The primary dependent variable was self-reported smoking status: frequency and intensity of lifetime (ever) and current (past 30-day) cigarette use.7 For this analysis, independent variables included gender, race (White vs non-White), college attendance after completing high school, intensity of exposure to best friends who smoked cigarettes in 12th grade (0 or 1 vs 2 or more), and alcohol use in the past 30 days in 12th grade (yes vs no).
A 6-level, ordered categorical variable of smoking behavior in 12th grade was created: 0, never smoker (never smoked a partial or whole cigarette in lifetime); 1, puffer (ever smoked a partial but not whole cigarette, but not within the past 30 days); 2, noncurrent smoker (ever smoked a whole cigarette, but not within the past 30 days); 3, current smoker (smoked a partial cigarette or 1 whole cigarette within the past 30 days); 4, current frequent smoker (smoked 2–19 whole cigarettes within the past 30 days); 5, heavy smoker (smoked 10 or more whole cigarettes within the past 7 days).14–16 These categories were replicated 1 year later.
Of 821 12th graders, students who had never smoked by 12th grade (never smokers, n = 404, or 49% of 12th graders) were selected for analysis, as were students who had ever smoked by 12th grade (ever smokers, including puffers, noncurrent smokers, current smokers, and current frequent smokers, n = 386, or 47% of 12th graders). Participants who were already heavy smokers in 12th grade (n = 31) were excluded from all analyses. Rates of initiation and progression and associated factors were examined at the bivariate (P < .10) and multivariate levels (P < .05).17 Initiation included ever having smoked even a puff off a cigarette since the last interview; progression included smoking more frequently or intensely over time.18,19
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Participant characteristics are in Table 1
. Among 12th grade never smokers, 25% (101 of 404) initiated smoking after 12th grade. Among eligible 12th grade ever smokers, 39% (152 of 386) progressed after 12th grade.
|
More intense exposure to friends who smoked in 12th grade (
2 = 2.97; df = 1; P = .09) and alcohol use in the 12th grade within the past 30 days (2 = 7.57; df = 1; P = .001) were associated with initiation after 12th grade. Female gender (2 = 3.44; d f = 1; P = .06) and not attending college (2=5.21, df=1, P = .02) were positively associated with progression after 12th grade. In multivariate analyses, alcohol use in the 12th grade remained a significant predictor of starting smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10, 3.0) after we controlled for the effect of exposure to 12th grade friends who smoked (OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.73, 2.44). College nonattendance remained a significant predictor of progression (OR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.05, 3.33) after we controlled for the effect of female gender (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.94, 2.19).
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
Twenty-five percent of participants who had never smoked prior to completing high school went on to try their first cigarette in the following year. Among participants who had ever smoked, 39% progressed to a more advanced smoking habit after 12th grade. Never smokers who were current alcohol users in 12th grade were twice as likely than others to initiate smoking. This suggests that risk for later smoking is increased among nonsmoking students who drink alcohol. This observation might be attributable to the social environment in which drinking and smoking take place20 and to the increasing influence of peers in alcohol and tobacco use over time.21,22 Not attending college brought about more intense and frequent smoking, possibly because of increased tobacco advertising directed to this population and difficulties reaching young adults with smoking prevention and intervention messages when they are not in school.23
Our data provide evidence that risk for smoking continues beyond high school and that alcohol use by senior year and not attending college play a role. The public health challenge is to better address cigarette smoking and alcohol use at the high school and post–high school levels and to continue to address these problems outside educational environments.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants CA084718, CA109250, and CA091831).
Human Participant Protection
This research was approved by the Georgetown University and University of Pennsylvania institutional review boards.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Peer Reviewed
Contributors
K. P. Tercyak supervised all aspects of the study and its implementation and led the writing. D. Rodriguez completed the analyses. J. Audrain-McGovern originated the study. All authors contributed ideas, synthesized analyses, interpreted findings, and contributed to writing and editing.
Accepted for publication July 3, 2006.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONReferences |
|---|
1. Rigotti NA, Lee JE, Wechsler H. US college students’ use of tobacco products: results of a national survey. JAMA. 2000;284:699–705.
2. Chassin L, Presson CC, Pitts SC, Sherman SJ. The natural history of cigarette smoking from adolescence to adulthood in a midwestern community sample: multiple trajectories and their psychosocial correlates. Health Psychol. 2000;19:223–231.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Choi WS, Harris KJ, Okuyemi K, Ahluwalia JS. Predictors of smoking initiation among college-bound high school students. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26:69–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Basen-Engquist K, et al. Transitions out of high school: time of increased cancer risk? Prev Med. 1997;26:694–703.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
5. Haddock CK, Lando HA, Pyle SA, et al. Prediction of adult-onset smoking initiation among U.S. Air Force recruits using the pierce susceptibility questionnaire. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:424–429.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
6. Wechsler H, Rigotti NA, Gledhill-Hoyt J, Lee H. Increased levels of cigarette use among college students: a cause for national concern. JAMA. 1998; 280:1673–1678.
7. 1994 Surgeon general’s report—preventing tobacco use among young people. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_1994/index.htm. Accessed May 8, 2006.
8. Backinger CL, Fagan P, Matthews E, Grana R. Adolescent and young adult tobacco prevention and cessation: current status and future directions. Tob Control. 2003;12:IV46–IV53.[Medline]
9. Jamner LD, Whalen CK, Loughlin SE, et al. Tobacco use across the formative years: a road map to developmental vulnerabilities. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5:S71–S87.
10. Chassin L, Presson CC, Rose JS, Sherman SJ. The natural history of cigarette smoking from adolescence to adulthood: demographic predictors of continuity and change. Health Psychol. 1996;15: 478–484.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
11. Ellickson PL, McGuigan KA, Klein DJ. Predictors of late-onset smoking and cessation over 10 years. J Adolesc Health. 2001;29:101–108.[Web of Science][Medline]
12. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Tercyak KP, Cuevas J, Rodgers K, Patterson F. Identifying and characterizing adolescent smoking trajectories. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13: 2023–2034.
13. Audrain J, Tercyak KP, Goldman P, Bush A. Recruiting adolescents into genetic studies of smoking behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11:249–252.
14. Soldz S, Cui X. Pathways through adolescent smoking: a 7-year longitudinal grouping analysis. Health Psychol. 2002;21:495–504.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
15. Colder CR, Mehta P, Balanda K, et al. Identifying trajectories of adolescent smoking: an application of latent growth mixture modeling. Health Psychol. 2001;20:127–135.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
16. Mehta PD, Neale MC, Flay BR. Squeezing interval change from ordinal panel data: latent growth curves with ordinal outcomes. Psychol Methods. 2004;9:301–333.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2000.
18. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Moss HB. Smoking progression and physical activity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:1121–1129.
19. Choi WS, Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Berry CC. Which adolescent experimenters progress to established smoking in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:385–391.[Web of Science][Medline]
20. Johnson KA, Jennison KM. The drinking-smoking syndrome and social context. Int J Addict. 1992; 27:749–792.[Web of Science][Medline]
21. Feldman L, Harvey B, Holowaty P, Shortt L. Alcohol use beliefs and behaviors among high school students. J Adolesc Health. 1999;24:48–58.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Wills TA, Vaughan R. Social support and substance use in early adolescence. J Behav Med. 1989; 12:321–339.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Bachman JG, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, Bryant AL, Merline AC. The Decline of Substance Use in Young Adulthood: Changes in Social Activities, Roles, and Beliefs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002. Research Monographs in Adolescence Series.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. V. Peterson Jr, K. A. Kealey, S. L. Mann, P. M. Marek, E. J. Ludman, J. Liu, and J. B. Bricker Group-Randomized Trial of a Proactive, Personalized Telephone Counseling Intervention for Adolescent Smoking Cessation J Natl Cancer Inst, October 21, 2009; 101(20): 1378 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Kealey, E. J. Ludman, P. M. Marek, S. L. Mann, J. B. Bricker, and A. V. Peterson Design and Implementation of an Effective Telephone Counseling Intervention for Adolescent Smoking Cessation J Natl Cancer Inst, October 21, 2009; 101(20): 1393 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |