Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jan 2, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.092981v1
98/2/209    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peppard, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Remington, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peppard, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Remington, P. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Community Health
Right arrow Media
Right arrow Public Health Practice
Right arrow Surveys
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research
February 2008, Vol 98, No. 2 | American Journal of Public Health 209-212
© 2008 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092981

FIELD ACTION REPORT

Ranking Community Health Status to Stimulate Discussion of Local Public Health Issues: The Wisconsin County Health Rankings

Paul E. Peppard, PhD, David A. Kindig, MD, PhD, Elizabeth Dranger, MS, Amanda Jovaag, MS and Patrick L. Remington, MD, MPH

Paul E. Peppard, David A. Kindig, and Patrick L. Remington are with the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, Madison, and the Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison. At the time of the study, Elizabeth Dranger and Amanda Jovaag were with the Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Paul E. Peppard, University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Center #1034, 1300 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706 (e-mail: ppep-pard{at}wisc.edu).


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
 DISCUSSION, EVALUATION, AND NEXT...
 REFERENCES
 

United Health Foundation’s America’s Health Rankings, which ranks the states from "least healthy" to "healthiest," receives wide press coverage and promotes discussion of public health issues. The University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute used the United Health Foundation’s model to develop the Wisconsin County Health Rankings ("Health Rankings") from existing county-level data. The institute first released the rankings in 2004. A survey of the Wisconsin county health officers indicated that they intend to use the rankings for needs assessment, program planning, and discussion with county health boards. The institute implemented many of the health officers’ suggestions for improvement of the rankings in subsequent editions. The methods employed to create the rankings should be applicable in other states.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
 DISCUSSION, EVALUATION, AND NEXT...
 REFERENCES
 
RANKINGS CONTRASTING cities, states, or nations for any number of characteristics—economic, education, health, and others—are continuously being released. Such rankings often receive substantial attention. In particular, United Health Foundation’s annual America’s Health Rankings,1 which ranks states from "least healthy" to "healthiest," receives wide press coverage and promotes discussion of public health issues. The University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute in Madison released its first annual Wisconsin County Health Rankings (hereafter "Health Rankings") report in January 2004, with the main purpose of encouraging discussion about important population health issues among Wisconsin public health and other policy communities. Our hope is that, by encouraging such discussion and raising awareness of variation in populations’ health within Wisconsin, the Health Rankings will yield an enhanced appreciation of the variety of factors that affect populations’ health and that are amenable to influence by public and private sector programs and policies.

The conceptual framework underpinning the Health Rankings is based on a model of population health improvement with health outcomes produced by a set of health determinants. Public and private sector programs and policies can enhance or limit these determinants.2 We describe briefly the design of the Health Rankings (more-detailed methods can be found elsewhere3), the method of annual release, and an evaluation of the Health Rankings’ usefulness to local public health authorities.


   PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
DISCUSSION, EVALUATION, AND NEXT...
 REFERENCES
 
Design of the Health Rankings
The Population Health Institute, in consultation with Wisconsin public health policymakers and other population health stakeholders, developed the first edition of the Health Rankings over an 18-month period. In creating the Health Rankings, we chose to focus on 2 categories of health measures: health determinants and outcomes (Figure 1Go). Outcomes measure the current state of health in a county, whereas determinants are predictors of future health outcomes. We used 2 broad subcategories to represent health outcomes: death and health status while alive. We assessed each with a single measure—years of potential life lost for death and self-reported general health status for health status.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		FIGURE 1—— Structure of the Wisconsin County Health Rankings.

Note. Counties receive rankings for a summary of health outcomes and health determinants and subcategories of outcomes and determinants. We ranked counties for each population health category or subcategory shown in a box. Health determinants in bold were not in the 2003 Health Rankings but were added in 2004. Measures in italics were in the 2003 Health Rankings but not subsequent Health Rankings. Specific data sources for health determinants and outcomes are detailed in Vila et al.4

 
We used the Wisconsin State Health Priorities to select health determinant measures.5 We divided 18 health determinant measures into 4 subcategories: access to health care, behaviors, socioeconomic factors, and the physical environment. Each of these categories and subcategories comprises 1 or more underlying measures. Criteria for selecting the measures included being a direct or proxy measure of important aspects of public health, available publicly and updated periodically at the county level, consistently collected across counties, and of sufficient quantity to have moderately stable county-level estimates. We then calculated selected health measures for each county, averaging 1 to 7 years of data depending on sample sizes (more years were averaged for measures with sparser data). Rankings for the health categories and subcategories ranked weighted averages of standardized scores (z scores) for the health measures that made up each health subcategory. Table 1Go is an excerpt of a table from the 2003 Health Rankings showing the counties with the 5 highest and 5 lowest overall health outcomes ranks—an average of mortality and health status. Detailed methods for weighting and scoring the health measures and derived ranks can be found elsewhere.3,6,7


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1—— Wisconsin Counties With the 5 Highest and 5 Lowest Overall Health Outcomes Ranks: Wisconsin County Health Rankings, 2003
 
Release of the Health Rankings
The Population Health Institute released its 2003 Health Rankings in early 2004. Local county health officers received a 13-page report by mail 2 weeks before the public release. Institute staff held 2 conference calls in which they described the Health Rankings to health officers and answered any questions. The Health Rankings were made public on the institute Web site and through a press release. Institute staff held an additional conference call with members of the press (primarily newspaper reporters).


   DISCUSSION, EVALUATION, AND NEXT STEPS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
 DISCUSSION, EVALUATION, AND NEXT...
REFERENCES
 
The first annual Health Rankings (for 2003) took approximately one and a half years and $100 000 to develop. Roughly 85% of the cost was for personnel, 10% for publication and distribution (several hundred glossy reports and a Web posting), and the remainder for data purchase. Most data were publicly available, but the Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services charged nominal fees for Wisconsin-specific survey data. Subsequent Health Rankings reports have cost less than half of the initial edition’s cost. We expect that public or private entities in other states would eventually be able to produce similar reports in 1 year for similar costs.

Several weeks after the 2003 Health Rankings’ release, we mailed surveys to each of Wisconsin’s 72 county public health officers. The surveys assessed officers’ awareness of the Health Rankings and their thoughts about the usefulness of the Health Rankings to their work. We sent a second mailing to officers who did not respond and called officers who did not respond to either mailing. The final response rate was 94%.

Table 2Go presents the results of the survey. Most respondents (82%) reported that the Health Rankings were useful to their work. Forty-four percent reported local media coverage of the Health Rankings (data not shown), 29% suggested that the Health Rankings might be described with more clarity, and 16% recommended an expansion of the environmental component.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. — Wisconsin County Health Officers’ Most Frequent Responses to Survey Questions About the 2003 Wisconsin County Health Rankings
 
The survey demonstrates that our ranking efforts were useful to the majority of county health officers, many of whom planned to use the rankings in community communications. In response to the survey and additional informal feedback, the Population Health Institute revised the 2004 Health Rankings to improve communication clarity, increase accessibility to the data underlying the rankings (on the institute Web site), and expand the number of health measures used (Figure 1Go). We view this continuing process of evaluation and modification of the Health Rankings in response to future evaluations as an ongoing, key component of the Health Rankings product.

Media coverage and evidence from the survey indicate that our primary goal for releasing the Health Rankings—encouraging discussion of population health issues within Wisconsin communities—is, in part, being achieved. However, we have found that the Health Rankings were occasionally overinterpreted as though they were designed to be a statistically robust comparator of communities’ population health status. We discouraged such interpretation because of important limitations of the data underlying the Health Rankings, including survey data sparseness for small-population counties. Thus, with each subsequent release of the Health Rankings, we caution against the overextension of their use (e.g., for tracking changes in health within counties in response to local public health programs). Nonetheless, we strive to enhance our methods and communication strategies so that future editions of the Wisconsin County Health Rankings might provide a continually improving basis for discussion of the distribution and determinants of population health among Wisconsin communities.


   Acknowledgments
 
The Wisconsin County Health Rankings, their evaluation, and the preparation of this article were supported by core funds of the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute.

We are grateful to Judy Knutson for administrative assistance in all aspects of this project.

Human Participant Protection
The Wisconsin County Health Rankings and the county health officer survey received exemption from review from the University of Wisconsin Health Sciences institutional review board.


   Footnotes
 
Peer Reviewed

Contributors
P.E. Peppard collaborated in designing the Wisconsin rankings, directly supervised data collection, performed statistical analyses, and had primary responsibility for writing the article. D. A. Kindig conceptualized and oversaw the design of the rankings. E. Dranger collaborated in data gathering and synthesis and conducted the surveys of Wisconsin county health officers. A. Jovaag collaborated in the design of the rankings and in data gathering and synthesis. P. L. Remington obtained funding for development of the rankings, supervised all aspects of their implementation, collaborated in their design, and conceptualized the survey of Wisconsin county health officers.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
 DISCUSSION, EVALUATION, AND NEXT...
 REFERENCES
 
1. United Health Foundation. America’s Health Rankings, 2006 ed. Available at: http://www.unitedhealthfoundation.org/ahr2006/media2006/shrmediakit/2006ahr.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2007.

2. Kindig D, Stoddart G. What is population health? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:380–383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Peppard PE, Kindig D, Jovaag A, Dranger E, Remington PL. An initial attempt at ranking population health outcomes and determinant. WMJ. 2004;103:52–56.[Medline]

4. Vila PM, Kempf AM, Booske BC, Athens JK, Remington PL. 2006 Wisconsin Rankings Full Report. Available at: http://www.pophealth.wisc.edu/uwphi/research/rankings_2006/full_report.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2007.

5. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services. Healthiest Wisconsin 2010. Part I: A Partnership Plan to Improve the Health of the Public. Available at: http://dhfs.wisconsin.gov/State-HealthPlan/shp-pdf/pph0276phip.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2007.

6. Peppard PE, Kindig D, Riemer A, Dranger E, Remington PL. Wisconsin County Health Rankings, 2003. Available at: http://www.pophealth.wisc.edu/UWPHI/research/rankings_2003/rankings_2003.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2007.

7. Peppard P, Kempf A, Dranger E, Kindig D, Remington PL. Wisconsin County Health Rankings, 2004. Available at: http://www.pophealth.wisc.edu/UWPHI/research/rankings_2004/rankings_2004.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2007.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AJPHHome page
S. H. Woolf, R. M. Jones, R. E. Johnson, R. L. Phillips Jr, M. N. Oliver, A. Bazemore, and A. Vichare
Avertable Deaths Associated With Household Income in Virginia
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2010; 100(4): 750 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.092981v1
98/2/209    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peppard, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Remington, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peppard, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Remington, P. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Community Health
Right arrow Media
Right arrow Public Health Practice
Right arrow Surveys
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association