Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Mar 29, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2004.057273v1
96/5/906    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pechmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reibling, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pechmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reibling, E. T.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057273


Research and Practice

Antismoking Advertisements for Youths: An Independent Evaluation of Health, Counter-Industry, and Industry Approaches

Cornelia Pechmann 1* Ellen T. Reibling 1

1 University of California, Irvine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cpechman{at}uci.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We used a validated copy test method to examine the effectiveness of 8 types of antismoking advertisements representing health, counterindustry, and industry approaches. We tested the hypothesis that health ads about tobacco victims can lower most adolescents' intent to smoke if the ads elicit disgust and antiindustry feelings rather than fear. We hypothesized null effects for adolescents with conduct disorder because of their abnormally low empathy.

Methods. Ninth-grade students from 8 California public schools (n=1725) were randomly assigned to view 1 of 9 videotapes containing a TV show with ads that included either a set of antismoking ads or a set of control ads. Participants completed baseline measures assessing personality traits and postexposure measures assessing smoking intent, feelings, beliefs, and ad evaluations.

Results. Ads focusing on young victims suffering from serious tobacco-related diseases elicited disgust, enhanced anti-industry motivation, and reduced intent to smoke among all but conduct-disordered adolescents. Counterindustry and industry ads did not significantly lower smoking intention.

Conclusions. Sponsors of tobacco use prevention ad campaigns should consider using ads showing tobacco-related disease and suffering, not just counterindustry ads. Ads should be copy tested before airing.

Key Words: Adolescent Health, Drugs, Tobacco Control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
D. E. Apollonio and R. E. Malone
Turning negative into positive: public health mass media campaigns and negative advertising
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2009; 24(3): 483 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
W. G. Shadel, C. S. Fryer, and S. Tharp-Taylor
Uncovering the most effective active ingredients of antismoking public service announcements: The role of actor and message characteristics
Nicotine Tob Res, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 547 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
C. I. Vardavas, G. Connolly, K. Karamanolis, and A. Kafatos
Adolescents perceived effectiveness of the proposed European graphic tobacco warning labels
Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 19(2): 212 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
C. Edwards, W. Oakes, and D. Bull
Out of the smokescreen II: will an advertisement targeting the tobacco industry affect young people's perception of smoking in movies and their intention to smoke?
Tob. Control, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 177 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association