Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jan 31, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.062620v1
96/3/532    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hasnain-Wynia, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hasnain-Wynia, R.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062620


Research and Practice

A System for Rapidly and Accurately Collecting Patients' Race and Ethnicity

David W. Baker 1*, Kenzie A. Cameron 2, Joseph Feinglass 2, Jason A. Thompson 2, Patricia Georgas 2, Shawn Foster 3, Deborah Pierce 3, Romana Hasnain-Wynia 3

1 Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
2 Northwestern University
3 Health Research and Educational Trust

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dbaker1{at}nmff.org.


   Abstract

Objectives. We assessed the feasibility of collecting race/ethnicity data from patients using their own preferred racial/ethnic terms.

Methods. The 424 patients described their race/ethnicity using their own categories, and we compared their descriptions with their responses to the questions (1) "Do you consider yourself Latino or Hispanic?" and (2) "Which category best describes your race?" (7 response options in our computer interview). We also determined patients' preferences between the 2 approaches.

Results. The proportions of patients who described themselves with 1, 2, 3, or 4 terms were 46%, 33%, 14%, and 6%, respectively; 2 said only "American" (1%,) and 1 refused to answer (0.5%). The average completion time was 37 plus/minus 17 seconds. Rates of missing values and categorization as "other" race were lower than with the closed questions. Agreement between racial/ethnic categorization with openended and closed responses was 93% (?=0.88). Latino/Hispanic and multiracial/multiethnic individuals were more likely to prefer using their own categories to describe their race/ethnicity.

Conclusions. Collecting race/ethnicity data using patients' own racial/ethnic categories is feasible with the use of computerized systems to capture verbatim responses and results in lower rates of missing and unusable data than do standard questions.

Key Words: African Americans/Blacks, Asians, Hispanics/Latinos, Race/Ethnicity, Statistics/Evaluation/Research




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
L. T. Bilheimer and J. E. Sisk
Collecting Adequate Data On Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Health: The Challenges Continue
Health Aff., March 1, 2008; 27(2): 383 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. M. Weinick, J. M. Caglia, E. Friedman, and K. Flaherty
Measuring Racial And Ethnic Health Care Disparities In Massachusetts
Health Aff., September 1, 2007; 26(5): 1293 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association