Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Nov 30, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.065268v1
97/1/171    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curry, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curry, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, H.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.065268


Research and Practice

A National Survey of Tobacco Cessation Programs for Youths

Susan J. Curry 1*, Sherry Emery 1, Amy K. Sporer 1, Robin Mermelstein 1, Brian R. Flay 1, Michael Berbaum 1, Richard B. Warnecke 1, Timothy Johnson 1, Paul Mowery 2, Jennifer Parsons 1, Lori Harmon 1, Lisa Hund 3, Henry Wells 4

1 University of Illinois at Chicago
2 Centers for Disease Control
3 Research Triangle Institute
4 Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Tennessee

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: suecurry{at}uic.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We collected data on a national sample of existing community-based tobacco cessation programs for youths to understand their prevalence and overall characteristics. Methods. We employed a 2-stage sampling design with US counties as the first-stage probability sampling units. We then used snowball sampling in selected counties to identify administrators of tobacco cessation programs for youths. We collected data on cessation programs when programs were identified. Results. We profiled 591 programs in 408 counties. Programs were more numerous in urban counties; fewer programs were found in low-income counties. State-level measures of smoking prevalence and tobacco control expenditures were not associated with program availability. Most programs were multisession, school-based group programs serving 50 or fewer youths per year. Program content included cognitive-behavioral components found in adult programs along with content specific to adolescence. The median annual budget was $2000. Few programs (9%) reported only mandatory enrollment, 35% reported mixed mandatory and voluntary enrollment, and 56% reported only voluntary enrollment. Conclusions. There is considerable homogeneity among community-based tobacco cessation programs for youths. Programs are least prevalent in the types of communities for which national data show increases in youths’ smoking prevalence.

Key Words: Adolescent Health, School Health, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
K. Sterling, S. Curry, A. Sporer, S. Emery, and R. Mermelstein
Implementation fidelity of packaged teen smoking cessation treatments delivered in community-based settings
Health Educ. Res., October 6, 2009; (2009) cyp053v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
E. Segawa, S. Emery, and S. J. Curry
Extended Generalized Linear Latent and Mixed Model
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, December 1, 2008; 33(4): 464 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association