Paul J. Masotti ^1*, Robert Fick ¹, Ana Johnson-Masotti ¹, Stuart MacLeod ²

¹ McMaster University
² BC Institute for Children's & Women's Health -University of British Columbia

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: masottip{at}post.queensu.ca.

	Abstract

Naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs) are broadly defined as communities where individuals either remain or move when they retire. Using the determinants of health model as a base, we hypothesize that some environmental determinants have a different impact on people at different ages.

Health benefits to living within NORCs have been observed and likely vary depending upon where the specific NORC exists on the NORC to healthy-NORC spectrum. Some NORC environments are healthier than others for seniors, because the NORC environment has characteristics associated with better health for seniors. Health benefits within healthy NORCs are higher where physical and social environments facilitate greater activity and promote feelings of well-being.

Compared to the provision of additional medical or social services, healthy NORCs are a low-cost community-level approach to facilitating healthy aging. Municipal governments should pursue policies that stimulate and support the development of healthy NORCs.

Key Words: Aging, Community Health, Environment, Health Law, Health Policy, Urban Health

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Kuller Is Phenomenology the Best Approach to Health Research? Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2007; 166(10): 1109 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Minerva BMJ, July 8, 2006; 333(7558): 104 - 104. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: