Patricia A. McDaniel ^1*, Gina Solomon ², Ruth E. Malone ¹

¹ University of California, San Francisco
² Natural Resources Defense Council & University of California, San Francisco

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: patriciamcdaniel{at}ucsf.edu.

	Abstract

In the United States, companies that use their own funds to test consumer products on their employees are subject to few regulations. Using previously nondisclosed tobacco industry documents, we reviewed the history of that industry's efforts to create internal guidelines on the conditions to be met before employee taste testers could evaluate cigarettes made from tobacco treated with experimental pesticides.

This history highlights 2 potential ethical issues raised by unregulated industrial research: conflict of interest and lack of informed consent. To ensure compliance with accepted ethical standards, an independent federal office should be established to oversee industrial research involving humans exposed to experimental or increased quantities of ingested, inhaled, or absorbed chemical agents. (Am J Public Health. 2005;95: XXX-XXX. doi:10.2105/AJPH. 2005.071969.)

Key Words: Ethics, Government, Health Policy, Tobacco

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. W. Rees, J. M. Kreslake, R. J. O'Connor, K. M. Cummings, M. Parascandola, D. Hatsukami, P. G. Shields, and G. N. Connolly Methods Used in Internal Industry Clinical Trials to Assess Tobacco Risk Reduction Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2009; 18(12): 3196 - 3208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]