Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Dec 28, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.077172v1
97/2/283    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins III, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bean, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins III, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bean, T. L.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.077172


Research and Practice

Using Participant Event Monitoring in a Cohort Study of Unintentional Injuries Among Children and Adolescents

J. R. Wilkins III 1*, J. Mac Crawford 1, Lorann Stallones 2, Kathleen M. Koechlin 3, Lei Shen 1, John Hayes 1, Thomas L. Bean 1

1 Ohio State University
2 Colorado State University
3 Ohio State University, Ohio Department of Health

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wilkins.2{at}osu.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We conducted a 3-year cohort study of 407 youths aged 9 to 18 years to develop multivariable risk prediction models of agriculture-related injuries. Methods. Data were obtained via participant event monitoring, with youths self-reporting injuries and exposures in daily diaries over a 13-week period. We evaluated data quality by comparing injury self-reports with other injury data. Results. Semilogarithmic plots of rates of all unintentional injuries combined (US data from 2000) as well as of agriculture-related injuries (US and Canadian data from 19 previous studies) graphed as a function of injury severity exhibited linearity, as did plots based on the present results. Severity-specific unintentional injury rates were 1.4- to 4.3-times higher than national rates, suggesting that our methodology can significantly reduce injury underreporting. In addition, at each severity level, estimated agriculture-related injury rates were 5.8- to 9.3-times higher than rates from previous national, regional, and state-based studies. Conclusions. Our approach to participant event monitoring can be implemented with aged 9 to 18 years and will yield reliable daily data on unintentional injuries.

Key Words: Child and Adolescent Health, Epidemiology, Injury/Emergency Care/Violence, Rural Health







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association