Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jul 27, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.078451v1
96/9/1548    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David B. Rein
Amanda A. Honeycutt
Lucia Rojas-Smith
James C. Hersey
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rein, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hersey, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rein, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hersey, J. C.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.078451


Health Policy and Ethics

Impact of the CDC's Section 317 Immunization Grants Program Funding on Childhood Vaccination Coverage

David B. Rein 1*, Amanda A. Honeycutt 1, Lucia Rojas-Smith 1, James C. Hersey 1

1 RTI International

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: drein{at}rti.org.


   Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Section 317 Grants Program is the main source of funding for state and jurisdictional immunization programs, yet no study has evaluated its direct impact on vaccination coverage rates. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model and data collected from 56 US jurisdictions to estimate the impact of 317 financial assistance immunization grants on childhood vaccination coverage rates from 1997 to 2003.

Our results showed that increases in 317 funding were significantly and meaningfully associated with higher rates of vaccination coverage; a $10 increase in per capita funding corresponded with a 1.6-percentage point increase in vaccination coverage. Policymakers charged with funding public health programs should consider this study's findings, which indicate that money allocated to vaccine activities translates directly into higher vaccine coverage rates.

Key Words: Government, Health Care Facilities/Services, Health Policy, Immunization/Vaccines, Prevention, Public Health Practice







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association