Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print May 30, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2006.087783v1
98/2/296    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Palusci, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Palusci, V. J.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2006.087783


Research and Practice

Public Health Surveillance of Fatal Child Maltreatment: Analysis of 3 State Programs

Patricia G. Schnitzer 1*, Theresa M. Covington 2, Stephen J. Wirtz 3, Wendy Verhoeck-Oftedahl 4, Vincent J. Palusci 5

1 University of Missouri -- Columbia
2 Michigan Public Health Institute
3 California Department of Health Services
4 Brown University Medical School
5 Wayne State University School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: schnitzerp{at}missouri.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We sought to describe approaches to surveillance of fatal child maltreatment and to identify options for improving case ascertainment.

Methods. Three states--California, Michigan, and Rhode Island--used multiple data sources for surveillance. Potential cases were identified, operational definitions were applied, and the number of maltreatment deaths was determined.

Results. These programs identified 258 maltreatment deaths in California, 192 in Michigan, and 60 in Rhode Island. Corresponding maltreatment fatality rates ranged from 2.5 per 100 000 population in Michigan to 8.8 in Rhode Island. Most deaths were identified by child death review teams in Rhode Island (98%), Uniform Crime Reports in California (56%), and child welfare agency data in Michigan (44%). Compared with the total number of cases identified, child welfare agency (the official source for maltreatment reports) and death certificate data underascertain child maltreatment deaths by 55% to 76% and 80% to 90%, respectively. In all 3 states, more than 90% of cases ascertained could be identified by combining 2 data sources.

Conclusions. No single data source was adequate for thorough surveillance of fatal child maltreatment, but combining just 2 sources substantially increased case ascertainment. The child death review team process may be the most promising surveillance approach.

Key Words: Child and Adolescent Health, Injury/Emergency Care/Violence, Public Health Practice, Surveillance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
C. Pritchard and R. Williams
Comparing Possible 'Child-Abuse-Related-Deaths' in England and Wales with the Major Developed Countries 1974-2006: Signs of Progress?
Br. J. Soc. Work, August 10, 2009; (2009) bcp089v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Public Health Association