Amanda Sacker ^1*, Richard D. Wiggins ², Mel Bartley ¹, Peggy McDonough ³

¹ University College London
² City University, London
³ Univeristy of Toronto

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.sacker{at}ucl.ac.uk.

	Abstract

Objectives. Poorer health in the United States compared with that of other developed nations has been documented. We reviewed literature on comparative social policy and life course research and compared associations between health and socioeconomic circumstances during an 11-year period in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Methods. We obtained data from the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics and the British Household Panel Survey (1990-2002). We used latent transition analysis to examine change in self-rated health from one discrete state to another; these health trajectories were then associated with socioeconomic measures at the beginning and at the end of the study period.

Results. We identified good and poor latent health states, which remained relatively stable over time. When change occurred, decline rather than improvement was more likely. UK populations were in better health compared with US populations and were more likely to improve over time. Labor market participation was more strongly associated with good health in the United Kingdom than in the United States.

Conclusions. National policies and practices may be keeping more US workers than UK workers who are in poor health employed, but British policies may give UK workers the chance to return to better health and to the labor force.

Key Words: Community Health, Epidemiology, Socioeconomic Factors, Surveys

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Avendano, M. M. Glymour, J. Banks, and J. P. Mackenbach Health Disadvantage in US Adults Aged 50 to 74 Years: A Comparison of the Health of Rich and Poor Americans With That of Europeans Am J Public Health, March 1, 2009; 99(3): 540 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]