Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jan 2, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.114249v1
98/2/284    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cutrona, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Himmelstein, D. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cutrona, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Himmelstein, D. U.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114249


Research and Practice

Characteristics of Recipients of Free Prescription Drug Samples: A Nationally Representative Analysis

Sarah L. Cutrona 1*, Steffie Woolhandler 1, Karen E. Lasser 1, David H. Bor 1, Danny McCormick 1, David U. Himmelstein 1

1 Harvard Medical School/Cambridge Health Alliance

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: scutrona{at}hsph.harvard.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. Free prescription drug samples are used widely in the United States. We sought to examine characteristics of free drug sample recipients nationwide.

Methods. We analyzed data on 32 681 US residents from the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative survey.

Results. In 2003, 12% of Americans received at least 1 free sample. A higher proportion of persons who had continuous health insurance received a free sample (12.9%) than did persons who were uninsured for part or all of the year (9.9%; P <.001). The poorest third of respondents were less likely to receive free samples than were those with incomes at 400% of the federal poverty level or higher. After we controlled for demographic factors, we found that neither insurance status nor income were predictors of the receipt of drug samples. Persons who were uninsured all or part of the year were no more likely to receive free samples (odds ratio [OR]=0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.087, 1.11) than were those continuously insured.

Conclusions. Poor and uninsured Americans are less likely than are wealthy or insured Americans to receive free drug samples.

Key Words: Community Health, Health Policy, Access to Care




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
L. M. Jampol, S. Packer, R. P. Mills, S. H. Day, P. R. Lichter, and for the Council of the American Ophthalmological S
A Perspective on Commercial Relationships Between Ophthalmology and Industry
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2009; 127(9): 1194 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. L. Cutrona, S. Woolhandler, K. E. Lasser, D. H. Bor, D. U. Himmelstein, W. H. Shrank, and N. S. LeLeiko
Free Drug Samples in the United States: Characteristics of Pediatric Recipients and Safety Concerns
Pediatrics, October 1, 2008; 122(4): 736 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
W. R. Vincent, A. M. Wiesner, and D. T. Steinke
"FREE" PRESCRIPTION DRUG SAMPLES ARE NOT FREE
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2008; 98(8): 1348 - 1349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
S. L. Cutrona, S. Woolhandler, K. E. Lasser, D. H. Bor, D. McCormick, and D. U. Himmelstein
CUTRONA ET AL. RESPOND
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2008; 98(8): 1349 - 1349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Drug Samples: Marketing Tool or Safety Net?
Journal Watch (General), February 14, 2008; 2008(214): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Exceptions
Dan Probonorep
AJPH Online, 6 Jan 2008 [Full text]
Fundamental flaw in study
Matthew A Schiffler
AJPH Online, 6 Jan 2008 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association