Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Feb 28, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.116509v1
AJPH.2007.116509v2
98/10/1881    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaestner, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaestner, R.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2007.116509


Research and Practice

Misclassification Bias and the Estimated Effect of Parental Involvement Laws on Adolescents’ Reproductive Outcomes

Silvie Colman 1*, Ted Joyce 2, Robert Kaestner 3

1 The Graduate Center, City University of New York
2 Baruch College, City University of New York, and National Bureau of Economic Research
3 University of Illinois Chicago and National Bureau of Economic Research

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: scolman{at}gc.cuny.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated the presence of misclassification bias in the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on minors’ reproductive outcomes when subjection to such laws was measured by age at the time of pregnancy resolution.

Methods. Using data from abortion and birth certificates, we evaluated the effect of Texas’s parental notification law on the abortion, birth, and pregnancy rates of adolescents aged 17 years compared with those aged 18 years on the basis of age at the time of pregnancy resolution and age at conception.

Results. On the basis of age at the time of the abortion or birth, the law was associated with a fall of 26%, 7%, and 11% in the abortion, birth, and pregnancy rates, respectively, of 17- relative to 18-year-olds. Based on age at the time of conception, the abortion rate fell 15%, the birth rate rose 2%, and the pregnancy rate remained unchanged.

Conclusions. Previous studies of parental involvement laws should be interpreted with caution because their methodological limitations have resulted in an overestimation of the fall in abortions and underestimation of the rise in births, possibly leading to the erroneous conclusion that pregnancies decline in response to such laws.

Key Words: Abortion, Health Policy, Birth Outcomes, Pregnancy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association