As a researcher of children's perceptions of risk to tobacco use and
exposures, I read with unfortunate agreement Samet & Burke's statement
that "sound science" is often used for delayed policy decisions related to
the harm from tobacco exposures.
In a recent town council decision in Oro Valley, AZ [suburb of
Tucson], the lawmakers justified their passage of a one of the weakest
city smoking ordinances of our time by stating that more "sound science"
was needed to document the "true harm" of being in public facility with
smokers, especially for children accompanying their parents to these
locations.
Curiously, this "non-action" occurred after the city of Tucson, (and
only one day after the county of Pima), had passed restrictive ordinances
of their own based on "sound science." Apparently, the dissemination of
"sound science" can be readily roadblocked by industry influences on "good
business."