Interesting experience, but the paper gives the impression that the
Mexico City Government does not face a budget constraint. Even with the
67% increase in budget the author mentions, it seems implausible that the
government can afford to ingnore budget constraints and efficiency issues.
Universal access with free-at-point-of-delivery health care services
holds an unfulfilled promise in developing countries for more than three
decades after the intent of Alma-Ata’s health for all.
Thus, it makes sense to better target subsidies to improve the
poorest’s health status and bridge the equity gap. Of course, this is an
efficiency-biased decision rule. However, a reasonable balance between
efficiency and the concept of equity used by the author (equal acces to
services, given the same need) involves an inescapable trade-off that she
does not seem to acknowledge, in spite of a laconic mention to the issue
of efficiency.