While we largely agree with the authors of your December 2006
Commentary, “Addressing Health Care Disparities and Increasing Workforce
Diversity,” they failed to highlight the crisis of the impending
elimination of major federal programs for enhancing diversity and filling
the “pipeline” for minority health professionals authorized by Title VII
of the Public Health Service Act--Health Careers Opportunity Programs
(HCOPs) and minority Centers of Excellence (COEs).
For 30 years, HCOPs have succeeded at K-12, community and 4-year
college, post-baccalaureate, and health professional school levels in
recruiting minority and disadvantaged students, enhancing their academic
skills, and supporting their preparation, entry, and graduation from
schools of dentistry, medicine, pharmacy, public and allied health. Since
1987, COEs, based at schools of dentistry, medicine, and pharmacy, have
conducted similar enrichment activities and assisted them in developing
competitive applicant pools. COEs recruit and retain minority faculty,
design and implement cultural competency and health disparities curricula,
conduct research in minority health, and provide community-based clinical
training for students among other programs.
Since their inception, some 459,036 underrepresented minority and
disadvantaged students have participated in these two programs, 38% at K-
12 levels, 37% in colleges, 22% in health professional schools, and 3% at
other levels. (1) Recent reviews of the literature have demonstrated their
effectiveness. (2-4) A controlled study on post-baccalaureate pre-medical
programs in California showed impressive results.(5)
Despite their history and demonstrated effectiveness, the President’s
budget proposal for the last several years, including his February 2007
proposal for Fiscal Year 2008, eliminated all federal funding for COEs and
HCOPs. Until 2005 Congress supported 34 COEs that received about $33.6
million and 74 HCOPs that received $35.6 million annually, but funding for
both programs were cut dramatically for FY2006, 65% and 89%, respectively.
In February 2007 Congress passed and the President signed a Joint Funding
Resolution that funded both programs at their FY2006 levels, i.e., $11.9
million for 4 COEs and $4 million for 4 HCOPs. A 2006 survey of all COEs
and HCOPs found that 83% would close without federal funding. (1) For
Dental Centers of Excellence that means losing those at the University of
Puerto Rico and University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston and San
Antonio; only Meharry would survive.
Federal funding has been effective in making the institutional
changes at academic health centers advocated by the authors. Unless the
funding for COEs and HCOPs is restored, our workforce will become less
diverse as our population becomes more so.
References:
1. Association of American Medical Colleges. Cuts to Title VII
jeopardize progress in addressing health disparities among minority,
underserved, and rural populations. Washington, DC: 2006.
http://www.aamc.org/advocacy/lbirary/laborhhs./chopcoesurvey.pdf (Accessed
March 7, 2007.)
2. Genshan S. Policy issues in dental work force diversity and
community-based dental education: A report to the California Endowment,
November 2004.
http://www.calendow.org/reference/publications/pdf/workforce/TCE0101-
2005_Policy_Issues_.pdf (Accessed March 7, 2007)
3. Grumbach K, Munoz C, Coffman J, Rosenoff E, Gandara P, Sepulveda
E. Strategies for improving diversity in the health professions. Center
for California Health Workforce Studies, University of California, San
Francisco. August 2005.
http://www.calendow.org/reference/publications/pdf/workforce/TCE0802-
2003_Strategies_For_.pdf (Accessed March 7, 2007)
4. Saha S, Shipman SA. The rationale for diversity in the health
professions. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources
and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions, October 2006.
http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/diversity/default.htm
(Accessed March 7, 2007)
5. Grumbach K, Chen E. Effectiveness of University of California
post-baccalaureate premedical programs in increasing medical school
matriculation for minority and disadvantaged students. JAMA 2006;296:1079
-1085.