April 23, 2008
To the Editor:
Goldman et al present themselves as protectors of the doctor-patient
relationship and suggest that the Health Department exceeds its mandate in
addressing non-communicable disease. Yet outreach for non-communicable
conditions, often using confidential information, has long been an
essential part of public health practice (e.g., newborn visits, lead
poisoning programs), as has involvement with clinical management of
patients (e.g., asthma, school health, and primary care provision).
Facilitating letters from doctors to their patients with diabetes
extends this tradition. Letters include educational materials, and the
service is supplemented by resources given to providers for patients
(e.g., glucose strips, blood pressure cuffs, and recreation center
memberships). The registry gives providers information about glycemic
control that, in the absence of electronic records in practices, most
would find difficult to obtain. If electronic records were universally
adopted and their registry potential utilized, our department’s A1C
registry would not be necessary. The Department, in a separate
initiative, is promoting precisely this approach by extending electronic
health records to providers caring for the sickest patients in NYC.
Diabetes disproportionately affects people of color. To claim that
services mainly benefiting Blacks and Latinos will “racialize” diabetes
confuses a “racialized” disease with the actions to address it. Failing
to prioritize vulnerable populations because of concern about
“racializing” condemns people to inadequate care.
Goldman et al. also question the Department’s proposal to remove the
requirement for separate written consent for HIV testing. Ironically, the
NYS law they defend actually deprives physicians of their autonomy to use
judgment about how to counsel patients. In September 2006, CDC issued
revised guidelines recommending routine HIV testing and removal of
separate written consent. Currently only 10 states require separate
written consent for HIV testing. Written consent is a barrier that
impedes early treatment and risk-reduction counseling for HIV-infected
people. People who know they are HIV-positive decrease risky sexual
behavior by about half. Separate consent procedures result in delayed
diagnosis, premature death, and continued spread of HIV. Furthermore, 71%
of Blacks, 63% of Latinos, and 65% of whites think “HIV testing should be
treated just like routine screening for any other disease”.
The system that Goldman et al. defend is failing miserably to deliver
appropriate care for common and devastating diseases, despite the fact
that the U.S. spends far more than any other industrialized country on
health care. Diabetes and HIV/AIDS are major epidemics of our era,
disabling and killing millions in this country, particularly people who
are poor, Black, or Hispanic. Public health agencies have an obligation
to intervene to slow these epidemics and reduce their impact.
Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH
Commissioner
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
Requests for reprints should be addressed to Thomas R. Frieden, MD,
MPH, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 125 Worth St,
Room 331, New York, NY 10013 (tfrieden@health.nyc.gov).
Acknowledgements:
The author thanks Shadi Chamany, Lynn Silver, Mary T. Bassett, Monica
Sweeney and others in the Health Department for their dedication to
monitoring, understanding and working to reduce the burden of chronic
disease and HIV/AIDS in New York City.
Human Participant Protection:
The public health interventions discussed in this letter are based on
established scientific understanding and do not require human participant
review.
References:
1. New York City press release. Mayor Bloomberg and Commissioner
Frieden unveil state-of-the-art electronic health record technology.
Accessed at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2008/mr064-08.shtml
2. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss
SB, Clark JE. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Revised
recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women
in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1-17.
3. Marks, G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-Analysis of
High-Risk Sexual Behavior in Persons Aware and Unaware They are Infected
With HIV in the United States: Implications for HIV Prevention Programs.
JAIDS. 2005;39:446-53.
4. Kaiser Family Foundation. Survey of Americans on HIV/AIDS.
Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation, 2006. Available at
http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/7513.pdf.
5. Frieden TR, Mostashari F. Health care as if health mattered. JAMA.
2008;299:950-2.