Abstract 1 of 1 
March 2006, Vol 96, No. 3 | American Journal of Public Health 532-537© 2006 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062620
David W. Baker, Kenzie A. Cameron, Joseph Feinglass, Jason Thompson, and Patricia Georgas are with the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill. D.W. Baker is also with the Institute for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine. Shawn Foster, Deborah Pierce, and Romana Hasnain-Wynia are with the Health Research and Educational Trust, Chicago. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to David W. Baker, MD, MPH, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60611 (e-mail: dwbaker{at}northwestern.edu).
Objectives. We assessed the feasibility of collecting race/ethnicity data from patients using their own preferred racial/ethnic terms. Methods. The 424 patients described their race/ethnicity using their own categories, and we compared their descriptions with their responses to the questions (1) "Do you consider yourself Latino or Hispanic?" and (2) "Which category best describes your race?" (7 response options in our computer interview). We also determined patients’ preferences between the 2 approaches.
Results.seconds. Rates of missing values and categorization as "other" race were lower than with the closed questions. Agreement between racial/ethnic categorization with open-ended and closed responses was 93% ( Conclusions. Collecting race/ethnicity data using patients’ own racial/ethnic categories is feasible with the use of computerized systems to capture verbatim responses and results in lower rates of missing and unusable data than do standard questions.
[Full Text of Baker et al.] [Reprint (PDF) Version of Baker et al.]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Download ALL Selected Citations
=0.88). Latino/Hispanic and multiracial/multiethnic individuals were more likely to prefer using their own categories to describe their race/ethnicity.