The Paradoxical Effects of Hurricane Katrina on Births and Adverse Birth Outcomes

You must log in or purchase access to view the full text. Log in and purchase options are available below.

Objectives. To review the trends in pregnancy outcomes after Hurricane Katrina and assess effects of the disaster on research and public health related to pregnant women.

Methods. We reexamined the 2004–2006 vital statistics data from Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi, assessing what the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the population would have been under varying risk scenarios.

Results. We saw a reduction in number of births as well as in low birth weight and preterm birth. If the number of births had stayed constant and the relative higher risk in the “missing” births had been between 17% and 100%, the storm would have been associated with an increased risk instead of a decrease. Because the relative decline in births was larger in Black women, the higher risk in the “missing” births required to create a significant increase associated with the storm was generally not as great as for White women.

Conclusions. Higher exposure to Katrina may have produced a reduction in births among high-risk women in the region rather than increasing adverse outcomes among those who did give birth.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

TOOLS

SHARE

ARTICLE CITATION

Emily W. Harville, PhD, Xu Xiong, MD, DrPH, Maya David, BS, and Pierre Buekens, MD, PhDAll authors are with the Department of Epidemiology, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA. Emily W. Harville is also with the Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. “The Paradoxical Effects of Hurricane Katrina on Births and Adverse Birth Outcomes”, American Journal of Public Health 110, no. 10 (October 1, 2020): pp. 1466-1471.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305769

PMID: 32816548