There is extensive evidence of racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of health care. The potential contribution of provider behavior to such disparities has remained largely unexplored. Do health and human service providers behave in ways that contribute to systematic inequities in care and outcomes? If so, why does this occur?

The authors build on existing evidence to provide an integrated, coherent, and sound approach to research on providers’ contributions to racial/ethnic disparities. They review the evidence regarding provider contributions to disparities in outcomes and describe a causal model representing an integrated set of hypothesized mechanisms through which health care providers’ behaviors may contribute to these disparities.

THERE IS EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE of racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of a wide range of health and social services. The past decade has seen an explosion of empirical literature documenting racial/ethnic disparities in medical care received, independent of clinical appropriateness, insurance status, treatment site, and other clinical and socioeconomic status (SES) correlates.1–6 These findings parallel documentations of disparities in the justice, child welfare, education, labor, and housing sectors.

This deluge of evidence leads us to some painful questions. Because institutional racism (differential processes or outcomes according to race/ethnicity) is the result of the sum total of policies and procedures created and enforced, and the behaviors engaged in, by institutional members, we must ask whether health and human service providers directly contribute to these racial/ethnic disparities in care and health outcomes. If so, how does this occur? Our intent here is to begin to answer such questions by applying existing theory and evidence to a framework designed to guide future inquiry and intervention. First, we provide a brief summary of the empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the behavior of health and human service providers contributes to race/ethnicity differences in care and, thus, institutional discrimination.

Second, we integrate the empirical evidence regarding social cognition, unintentional bias, and provider behavior into a hypothesized causal model. Social cognition is a subfield of social psychology that studies how we make sense of other people, that is, the mental representations and processes that underlie social perception, social judgment, social interaction, and social influence. Social psychologists focusing on social cognition have been studying the ways in which group characteristics influence person perception and interpersonal processes for several decades, resulting in a massive body of evidence with significant implications for understanding how race/ethnicity influences provider behavior. Finally, we briefly discuss implications for future directions and interventions.

Public health, medical care, and human service providers may influence race/ethnicity and class health disparities in several interconnected ways. First, providers may influence help seekers’ views of themselves and their relation to the world (society, culture, community). For example, providers may intentionally or unintentionally reflect and reinforce societal messages regarding help seekers’ fundamental value, self-reliance, competence, and deservingness.7–9 Providers may both have and intentionally or unintentionally communicate lower expectations for patients in disadvantaged social positions (owing to their race/ethnicity, income, education, class, or any stigmatized characteristic) than for their more advantaged counterparts. In this way, providers can influence help seekers’ expectations for the future, the degree to which they expect to obtain the resources and help they need, and their expectations for improvements in their situations or conditions,10–16 which in turn may account for some of the disparities observed in outcomes and health status.14,17,18

Second, the potential influence of provider communications on help seekers’ health-related cognition and behavior has been well documented.7,19–32 Thus, disparities in communications regarding health promotion and disease prevention behavior and services may account for an additional portion of documented health disparities. Third, providers are powerful gatekeepers and may influence health disparities via such mechanisms as differential access to treatments or services and loss of benefits and rights. This is the mechanism that has received the most research attention and thus is a significant part of our focus here. Research focusing specifically on provider contributions to racial/ethnic disparities in care is in its infancy. However, a growing body of evidence is reviewed briefly in the sections to follow (for a more extensive review, see van Ryn33).

Specialty Care

There is good evidence of physician contributions to racial/ethnic disparities in both kidney transplant rates and cardiac procedures.34–36 For example, one study showed that Black dialysis patients were less likely than their clinically similar White counterparts to be told about transplantation, obtain all of the medical information they desire, discuss with a physician the possibility of receiving a kidney from a family member, and report that a physician had recommended a transplant. Among patients who were certain they wanted a transplant, Blacks were less likely than Whites to be referred for evaluation and to be placed on a waiting list.35 Similarly, racial/ethnic disparities have been extensively documented in relation to cardiac tests, diagnoses, and procedures,2,37 with several studies revealing significant provider contributions to these disparities via treatment recommendations and clinical decisionmaking.36,38,39

Pain Assessment and Treatment

Non-Whites have been found to be at significantly higher risk for inadequate or no pain assessment or pain control than their White counterparts in a variety of situations, including emergency department treatment of long bone fractures,40,41 nonmalignant pain in a nursing home,42 treatments for cancer-related pain,43,44 and evaluation of chest pain emergencies.45 These studies suggest that both nurses and physicians may contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in care, although in general the role of nurses has been understudied.

Mental Health Services

It has been shown that, independent of clinical factors, both US and UK psychiatrists are more likely to prescribe antipsychotic medications to non-Whites than to their White counterparts; also, these individuals are more likely to be involuntarily hospitalized and to be placed in seclusion once hospitalized.46–63 In addition, African Americans and Latinos have been found to be less likely than Whites to receive guideline-adherent treatment64,65 and follow-up.66

Child Welfare and At-Risk Youths

African American children are more likely to be placed in foster homes than White children and, along with Hispanic and American Indian children, are overrepresented in child abuse and neglect reports.67,68 These disparities persist even though 3 national incidence studies conducted by the US Department of Health and Human Services indicate that child maltreatment does not vary according to race/ethnicity.69 Similarly, in regard to every offense category, Black youths are more likely than White youths to be incarcerated. Among those charged with drug offenses, Black youths are 48 times more likely than White youths to be sentenced to juvenile prison.70

Although this body of evidence provides support for the hypothesis that providers contribute to at least a portion of the observed racial/ethnic disparities in health care and outcomes, these studies do not provide sufficient insight into why providers’ behavior varies by race/ethnicity to allow for meaningful conclusions or intervention directions. Thus, the following section is intended to help guide research and intervention directions by proposing a causal model representing a set of hypotheses regarding the effect of help seekers’ race/ethnicity on providers’ beliefs and behaviors. These hypotheses result from an integration of the social cognition literature and the empirical literature on provider–patient interactions.

Figure 1 represents an integration of the social cognition and provider behavior research into a hypothesized model of the effects of help seeker race/ethnicity on provider behaviors and, in turn, the effects of these behaviors on help seeker outcomes (care received, case disposition, or service provided). It is important to note here that the effect of social class is likely to be as powerful as that of race/ethnicity and that there are likely to be significant interactions between class and race/ethnicity. In addition, the concepts represented in Figure 1 are clearly influenced by economic, social, and setting factors. However, these important structural factors, as well as the independent and interaction effects of class, have received little research attention and are beyond our scope here.

Arrow A in Figure 1 reflects the hypothesis that the primary cognitive mediator of the effect of help seeker race/ethnicity on provider behavior is providers’ conscious and unconscious beliefs about the help seeker. We expect providers to conduct encounters, make assessments, and recommend courses of action in a way that it is unaffected or unbiased by the sociodemographic characteristics of the people they serve. In addition, they are expected to be attuned to cultural differences and to be culturally sensitive as they work, in an unbiased manner, with various populations. Finally, they are expected to engage in these practices with little specific training or support.

Unfortunately, there is a massive body of research on social categorization and stereotyping demonstrating that humans universally apply stereotypes when making sense of other people.71–75 All humans share the highly adaptive cognitive strategy of making the world more manageable by using categorizing and generalizing techniques to simplify the massive amounts of complex information and stimuli to which they are exposed.73,76,77 This process is efficient. It simplifies cognitive processing, reduces effort, and frees cognitive resources to meet other demands.78 In applying this process to the social world, people develop beliefs and expectations about categories or groups of people and generalize these beliefs and expectations to all individuals mentally assigned to a given category or group.72,73,76–80

There is substantial evidence that when people mentally assign an individual to a particular class or group, they unconsciously and automatically81 assign the characteristics of that group to the individual in question, a process referred to as stereotype application.73,82–84 Although most people do not believe that they engage in stereotyping, almost all of us are able to quickly list the characteristics and describe the images that automatically come to mind when we hear words such as “librarian,” “welfare mother,” “plumber,” “Navajo,” “Minnesotan,” or “New Yorker.” It is both difficult and painful for many of us to accept the massive evidence that social categories automatically and unconsciously influence the way we perceive people and, in turn, influence the way in which we interpret their behavior and behave toward them. However, given that this type of strategy is common to all humans in all cultures and is more likely to be used in situations that tax cognitive resources (e.g., time pressure),78,82,85–88 the expectation that providers will be immune is unrealistic.

There is substantial evidence that patients’ sex, age, diagnosis, marital status, sexual orientation, type of illness,29,30,78,89–105 and, more recently, race/ethnicity58,71,106–108 can influence providers’ beliefs and expectations. For example, one study revealed that, independent of physician characteristics and patient personality, clinical, and sociodemographic characteristics, cardiac patients’ race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status negatively influenced physicians’ ratings of their personality, education, intelligence, career demands, and likely treatment adherence.71 However, existing research is limited and unable to predict circumstances in which providers’ perceptions will or will not be influenced by help seeker characteristics, nor can we predict the specific perceptions that will be influenced.

Arrow B reflects the hypothesis that providers’ beliefs about help seekers influence their interpretation of the problems or symptoms of these individuals. There is ample evidence that we interpret information about others through a “screen,” filter, or framework of beliefs created by the way in which we cognitively classify them.72,73,77,78,90,109 A number of studies have shown that observers assign different meanings to the same behavior depending on the race, class, or other demographic characteristics of the individual involved.73,74,77,110–114 The effect of race/ethnicity on interpretations of behavior is exacerbated when the behavior is ambiguous or open to multiple interpretations.74,115

For example, Burk and Sher found that mental health workers’ diagnoses of a videotaped adolescent varied significantly according to whether they were told or not told that they were watching the child of an alcoholic.116 Another example of this phenomenon can be found in a study in which one group of 20 psychotherapists was presented with a scenario involving a White adolescent and a second group of 20 psychotherapists was presented with an identical scenario involving a Black adolescent. Overall, the behaviors of the Black adolescent were rated as less clinically significant than the behaviors of the White adolescent.117 Finally, Stern et al. found that medical students’ and Israeli providers’ assessments of normal children were negatively influenced by whether or not they were told the children had been born prematurely.96,97

Arrow C reflects the hypothesis that providers’ beliefs about help seekers’ social and behavioral characteristics directly influence their professional or clinical decisionmaking. This may occur as a result of either of 2 kinds of interconnected reasoning: moral rationing or appropriateness. In the case of moral rationing, the provider believes that a patient’s characteristics make her or him more or less deserving of treatment. For example, a cardiac surgeon told one of the authors that he was not going to treat cardiac patients who were “just going to go out and do drugs.” In the case of appropriateness, the provider believes that a social or behavioral characteristic of the help seeker makes her or him more or less appropriate for a particular treatment or more or less likely to benefit from a service or procedure.

To date, only 2 studies of which we are aware have tested this hypothesized cause of racial/ethnic disparities in treatment. Bogart and colleagues found that physicians were more likely to provide highly active antiretroviral therapy to HIV/AIDS patients when they were perceived as likely to be adherent to treatment.118 They then examined patient characteristics associated with physician predictions of adherence by randomly assigning physicians to review patient vignettes varying only in terms of the patient’s sex, disease severity, ethnicity, and risk group. Results revealed that, independent of other factors, the patient depicted in the African American vignette was more likely to be rated as nonadherent.119

Similarly, van Ryn et al. found that physicians’ ratings of patients’ likelihood of having adequate social support or participating in cardiac rehabilitation predicted physicians’ recommendations for revascularization, independent of the clinical appropriateness of revascularization and patient demographic characteristics. In turn, these physicians was more likely to rate African American patients as lacking in social support and as more unlikely to participate in cardiac rehabilitation than White patients.120

It is possible that these findings are due to providers’ overapplication of population statistics to individual help seekers. There is evidence that data on population rates may be incorporated into providers’ general belief systems and professional decisionmaking such that group probabilities are overapplied to decisionmaking about individuals.121,122 In this way, providers may fail to correctly incorporate individual data, instead being swayed by their beliefs regarding the probability of individuals in a particular sociodemographic category possessing a given characteristic.123 This is a disturbing possibility because it suggests that statistical data on marginalized populations may be inadvertently incorporated and applied by providers in a way that reinforces marginalization. Some of the data that reinforce bias in fact result from bias, compounding this situation. For example, as mentioned earlier, although 3 national incidence studies indicate that child maltreatment does not vary according to race,69 minority groups are heavily overrepresented in child neglect and abuse reports; as a result, in publications based on reported cases of abuse, authors state that victimization varies by race.68,124

Arrow D reflects the hypothesis that providers’ conscious beliefs about and unconscious stereotypes regarding help seekers influence their interpersonal behavior. There is considerable evidence that stereotypes activated outside of consciousness influence our behavior toward other individuals and thus affect their reactions and behaviors, as represented in arrow I.74,125 For example, one study revealed that subliminal exposure to photographs of African Americans as opposed to photographs of Whites caused naive participants to unknowingly behave in a more hostile manner in a subsequent word-guessing game.125 The partners of these participants, who were also unaware of the experiment’s design, in turn behaved in a more hostile manner. These findings illustrate the way in which the well-documented “self-fulfilling prophecy” can be produced. Provider behavior may be influenced by help seeker race/ethnicity (or another characteristic), and this behavior influences help seekers’ behavior in turn.77,82,125–127

Several studies directly support the hypothesis that help seekers’ characteristics influence provider behavior. In wellcontrolled studies, physicians have been found to have a less participatory decisionmaking style128,129 and to adopt a more “narrowly biomedical” communication pattern (characterized by low patient control of communication and psychosocial talk and high levels of physician biomedical information provision and closed-ended question asking) with non-White than with White patients.130 In other studies, patients’ characteristics have been found to be associated with provider communication effectiveness131–133 and physician interpersonal behaviors such as nonverbal attention, empathy, courtesy, and information giving.134

Arrows E and F represent the hypotheses that providers’ interpersonal behavior influences help seekers’ satisfaction as well as cognitive factors such as attitudes, self-efficacy, trust, and behavioral intentions, while arrow G represents the well-established causal relationship between cognitive factors and behavior. There is a substantial body of evidence indicating a strong relationship between provider interpersonal behavior and patient satisfaction, adherence, utilization, and outcomes.7,19,20,29–32 A more participatory decisionmaking style on the part of providers, which can be defined as increased help seeker engagement in medical care through information sharing, negotiation, and consensus seeking, has been shown to be positively associated with satisfaction,29,30,128–130 disclosure,135 successful self-management, adherence, lower pain levels, and symptom recovery20,21,25,136–139 among patients.

In addition, there is evidence that help seekers’ race/ethnicity and SES influence the substantive content of encounters. For example, 4 separate studies involving patients with advanced illnesses showed that non-White patients were less likely to report that their provider discussed end-of-life care with them than their White counterparts, despite their equal or stronger desire to have such a discussion.133,140–142 Similarly, African Americans and low-income patients have been found to be less likely to report receiving advice to quit smoking during their primary care visit,143 less likely to discuss diet and exercise with their physician,144 less likely to receive a recommendation for mammography,144–146 and less likely to receive prenatal preventive care advice regarding smoking cessation, alcohol use, and breastfeeding.147

Arrow H represents the hypothesis that providers’ beliefs about help seekers are influenced by help seekers’ behaviors during the encounter. In one study testing this hypothesis, physicians viewed randomly assigned videotapes of women seeking care for breast cancer; the videotapes varied only in regard to the patients’ sociodemographic characteristics, general health status, and assertiveness. Results revealed that physician decisions were affected by the interaction of patient assertiveness with race and SES, in that assertive behavior increased the likelihood of full tumor staging among Black and low-SES patients but not White or upper-SES patients.148 This study suggests the possibility that providers’ beliefs and behaviors are influenced by complex interactions between patients’ race/ethnicity and behavior.

While not a primary focus of this review, it is important to bear in mind that a variety of class and cultural factors contribute to help seeker variations in health beliefs, beliefs regarding the nature of care and cure, and past experiences with and attitudes toward providers. These factors, in turn, influence help seekers’ interactions with providers.149–151 Further research is necessary to examine the complex interactions between the expectations, beliefs, and behaviors that help seekers and providers bring to their encounters.

In conclusion, there is sufficient evidence for the hypothesis that provider behaviors contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in care to warrant further study and intensive efforts to develop evidence-based interventions. There have been insufficient resources devoted to this line of inquiry, perhaps reflecting the fact that bias on the part of providers is very uncomfortable and disturbing to contemplate. Many providers, devoted to justice and equity, may understandably find the hypothesis that they and their professional peers contribute to systematic inequities in health difficult to believe. Yet, we would argue that resistance to exploring the ways in which providers may contribute to health disparities reflects a lack of understanding of the automatic, unconscious, and ubiquitous nature of fundamental social cognition processes.

In addition, lack of attention to the interpersonal mechanisms or mediators of institutionalized discrimination may undermine the effectiveness of our strongest policy- and organizational-level strategies. Laws, incentives, mandates, court-based remedies, reimbursement methodologies, sanctions, and reorganizations may not create the desired effects if the fundamental human information-processing, social cognition, and social interaction processes that contribute to institutional discrimination are not addressed.

Furthermore, the current lack of research in this area creates a barrier to the development of evidence-based interventions addressing racial/ethnic disparities in care. Our ability to develop informed interventions is severely limited by our lack of knowledge regarding the effects of providers’ education, socialization, setting, and other characteristics on the degree to which their behaviors are influenced by help seekers’ race/ethnicity. Two overarching categories of research are suggested by the evidence gathered to date: (1) multimethod studies (e.g., combining clinical, survey, and qualitative data) intended to test and refine the hypotheses presented here and provide greater knowledge of the conditions under which provider behaviors do and do not influence racial/ethnic disparities and (2) theory- and evidence-based intervention research intended to: develop and test methods that influence racial/ethnic variations in providers’ perceptions of help seekers; reduce disparities in providers’ and help seekers’ behaviors during their encounters; and examine the resultant effects on racial/ethnic variations in care.

Finally, although social categorization is an automatic and dominant information-processing strategy, recent reviews of the evidence suggest that some of the associated processes may be controllable in certain circumstances.82,87 These reviews point to the crucial influence of 3 broad categories of factors that may influence automatic activation of stereotypes: public health providers’ acceptance and awareness of the automatic nature of these processes, providers’ motivation to detect and inhibit stereotypes, and setting and system characteristics that allow providers to have sufficient cognitive resources to overcome and replace automatic cognitive processes.

This evidence clearly suggests that while awareness and motivation are necessary conditions for individuals to exert control over stereotypes, they are not sufficient. Considerable reorganization of our service delivery and reimbursement systems may be needed if providers are to have the time and cognitive resources needed to overcome unconscious bias.82,87

The present work was supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service, and the National Institutes of Health, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Portions of this research were presented at the National Institutes of Health Conference on Racial Bias and Health, April 2002; the Health Services Research and Development Service 19th Annual Meeting, February 2001, Washington, DC; and the 2001 Academy for Health Services Research meeting in Atlanta, Ga.

We wish to thank H. Jack Geiger and Joseph Betancourt for helpful feedback.


1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002. Google Scholar
2. Einbinder LC, Schulman KA. The effect of race on the referral process for invasive cardiac procedures. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57(suppl 1):162–180. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
3. Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000;283:2579–2584. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
4. Fiscella K, Franks P, Doescher MP, Saver BG. Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample. Med Care. 2002;40:52–59. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
5. Etchason J, Armour B, Ofili E, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2001;285:883. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
6. Oddone EZ, Petersen LA, Weinberger M, Freedman J, Kressin NR. Contribution of the Veterans Health Administration in understanding racial disparities in access and utilization of health care: a spirit of inquiry. Med Care. 2002;40(suppl 1):I3–I13. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
7. Roter D. The medical visit context of treatment decision-making and the therapeutic relationship. Health Expectations. 2000;3:17–25. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
8. Roter DL, Hall JA. Health education theory: an application to the process of patient-provider communication. Health Educ Res. 1991;6:185–193. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
9. van Ryn M, Heaney CA. Developing effective helping relationships in health education practice. Health Educ Behav. 1997;24:683–702. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
10. Kylma J, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Lahdevirta J. Hope, despair and hopelessness in living with HIV/AIDS: a grounded theory study. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33:764–775. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
11. Centers LC. Beyond denial and despair: ALS and our heroic potential for hope. J Palliat Care. 2001;17:259–264. MedlineGoogle Scholar
12. Kylma J, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. Hope in nursing research: a metaanalysis of the ontological and epistemological foundations of research on hope. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25:364–371. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
13. Staudenmayer H. Clinical consequences of the EI/MCS “diagnosis”: two paths. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996;24:S96–S110. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
14. Gilliss CL, Gortner SR, Hauck WW, Shinn JA, Sparacino PA, Tompkins C. A randomized clinical trial of nursing care for recovery from cardiac surgery. Heart Lung. 1993;22:125–133. MedlineGoogle Scholar
15. Olsson B, Tibblin G. Effect of patients’ expectations on recovery from acute tonsillitis. Fam Pract. 1989;6:188–192. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
16. Heaney C, van Ryn M. The implication of status, class, gender, and cultural diversity for health education practice: the case of worksite stress reduction programs. Health Educ Res Theory Pract. 1996;11:57–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
17. Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;165:174–179. Google Scholar
18. Borkan JM, Quirk M. Expectations and outcomes after hip fracture among the elderly. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1992;34:339–350. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
19. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357:757–762. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
20. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804. MedlineGoogle Scholar
21. Greenlund KJ, Giles WH, Keenan NL, Croft JB, Mensah GA. Physician advice, patient actions, and health-related quality of life in secondary prevention of stroke through diet and exercise. Stroke. 2002;33:565–571. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
22. Glasgow RE, Eakin EG, Fisher EB, Bacak SJ, Brownson RC. Physician advice and support for physical activity: results from a national survey. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21:189–196. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
23. Lane DS, Zapka J, Breen N, Messina CR, Fotheringham DJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: the case of breast cancer screening among older women. Prev Med. 2000;31:481–493. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
24. Brenes GA, Paskett ED. Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2000;31:410–416. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
25. Greenlund KJ, Keenan NL, Anderson LA, Mandelson MT, Newton KM, LaCroix AZ. Does provider prevention orientation influence female patients’ preventive practices? Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:104–110. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
26. May DS, Kiefe CI, Funkhouser E, Fouad MN. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence. Prev Med. 1999;28:386–394. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
27. Li VC, Coates TJ, Ewart CK, Kim YJ. The effectiveness of smoking cessation advice given during routine medical care: physicians can make a difference. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3:81–86. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
28. Nichol KL, MacDonald R, Hauge M. Factors associated with influenza and pneumococcal vaccination behavior among high-risk adults. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:673–677. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
29. Bertakis KD, Callahan EJ, Helms LJ, Azari R, Robbins JA, Miller J. Physician practice styles and patient outcomes: differences between family practice and general internal medicine. Med Care. 1998;36:879–891. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
30. Bertakis KD, Roter D, Putnam SM. The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1991;32:175–181. MedlineGoogle Scholar
31. Tates K, Meeuwesen L. Doctor-parent-child communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:839–851. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
32. Rao JK, Weinberger M, Kroenke K. Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes: a literature review. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1148–1155. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
33. van Ryn M. Research on the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in medical care. Med Care. 2002;40(suppl 1):I140–I151. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
34. Thamer M, Hwang W, Fink NE, et al. U.S. nephrologists’ attitudes towards renal transplantation: results from a national survey. Transplantation. 2001;71:281–288. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
35. Ayanian JZ, Cleary PD, Weissman JS, Epstein AM. The effect of patients’ preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1661–1669. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
36. Hannan EL, van Ryn M, Burke J, et al. Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery. Med Care. 1999;37:68–77. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
37. Kressin NR, Petersen LA. Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures: review of the literature and prescription for future research. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:352–366. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
38. Maynard C, Fisher LD, Passamani ER, Pullum T. Blacks in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): race and clinical decision making. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1446–1448. LinkGoogle Scholar
39. Naumburg EH, Franks P, Bell B, Gold M, Engerman J. Racial differentials in the identification of hypercholesterolemia. J Fam Pract. 1993;36:425–430. MedlineGoogle Scholar
40. Todd KH, Deaton C, D’Adamo AP, Goe L. Ethnicity and analgesic practice. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:11–16. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
41. Todd KH, Samaroo N, Hoffman JR. Ethnicity as a risk factor for inadequate emergency department analgesia. JAMA. 1993;269:1537–1539. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
42. Won A, Lapane K, Gambassi G, Bernabei R, Mor V, Lipsitz LA. Correlates and management of nonmalignant pain in the nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:936–942. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
43. Anderson KO, Mendoza TR, Valero V, et al. Minority cancer patients and their providers: pain management attitudes and practice. Cancer. 2000;88:1929–1938. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
44. Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Baez L, Loehrer P, Pandya KJ. Pain and treatment of pain in minority patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:813–816. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
45. Bell PD, Hudson S. Equity in the diagnosis of chest pain: race and gender. Am J Health Behav. 2001;25:60–71. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
46. Cuffe SP, Waller JL, Cuccaro ML, Pumariega AJ, Garrison CZ. Race and gender differences in the treatment of psychiatric disorders in young adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34:1536–1543. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
47. DelBello MP, Lopez-Larson MP, Soutullo CA, Strakowski SM. Effects of race on psychiatric diagnosis of hospitalized adolescents: a retrospective chart review. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2001;11:95–103. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
48. Kales HC, Blow FC, Bingham CR, Roberts JS, Copeland LA, Mellow AM. Race, psychiatric diagnosis, and mental health care utilization in older patients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;8:301–309. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
49. Kales HC, Blow FC, Bingham CR, Copeland LA, Mellow AM. Race and inpatient psychiatric diagnoses among elderly veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51:795–800. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
50. Strakowski SM, Shelton RC, Kolbrener ML. The effects of race and comorbidity on clinical diagnosis in patients with psychosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;54:96–102. MedlineGoogle Scholar
51. Strakowski SM, Lonczak HS, Sax KW, et al. The effects of race on diagnosis and disposition from a psychiatric emergency service. J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56:101–107. MedlineGoogle Scholar
52. Strakowski SM, Hawkins JM, Keck PE Jr., et al. The effects of race and information variance on disagreement between psychiatric emergency service and research diagnoses in first-episode psychosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58:457–463. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
53. Crawford K, Fisher WH, McDermeit M. Racial/ethnic disparities in admissions to public and private psychiatric inpatient settings: the effect of managed care. Adm Policy Ment Health. 1998;26:101–109. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
54. Davies S, Thornicroft G, Leese M, Higgingbotham A, Phelan M. Ethnic differences in risk of compulsory psychiatric admission among representative cases of psychosis in London. BMJ. 1996;312:533–537. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
55. Dixon L, Green-Paden L, Delahanty J, Lucksted A, Postrado L, Hall J. Variables associated with disparities in treatment of patients with schizophrenia and comorbid mood and anxiety disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:1216–1222. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
56. Kilgus MD, Pumariega AJ, Cuffe SP. Influence of race on diagnosis in adolescent psychiatric inpatients. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34:67–72. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
57. Lewis DO, Balla DA, Shanok SS. Some evidence of race bias in the diagnosis and treatment of the juvenile offender. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1979;49:53–61. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
58. Lewis G, Croft-Jeffreys C, David A. Are British psychiatrists racist? Br J Psychiatry. 1990;157:410–415. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
59. Benson PR. Factors associated with antipsychotic drug prescribing by southern psychiatrists. Med Care. 1983;21:639–654. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
60. Lawson WB, Hepler N, Holladay J, Cuffel B. Race as a factor in inpatient and outpatient admissions and diagnosis. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994;45:72–74. MedlineGoogle Scholar
61. Takei N, Persaud R, Woodruff P, Brockington I, Murray RM. First episodes of psychosis in Afro-Caribbean and White people: an 18-year follow-up population-based study. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172:147–153. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
62. Whaley A. Racism in the provision of mental health services: a social-cognitive analysis. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1998;68:47–57. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
63. Flaherty JA, Meagher R. Measuring racial bias in inpatient treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:679–682. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
64. Wang PS, Berglund P, Kessler RC. Recent care of common mental disorders in the United States: prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:284–292. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
65. Young AS, Klap R, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. The quality of care for depressive and anxiety disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:55–61. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
66. Schneider EC, Zaslavsky AM, Epstein AM. Racial disparities in the quality of care for enrollees in Medicare managed care. JAMA. 2002;287:1288–1294. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
67. Morton T, Holder W. Decision Making in Children’s Protective Services: Advancing the State of the Art. Atlanta, Ga: Child Welfare Institute; 1998. Google Scholar
68. Drake B, Zuravin S. Bias in child maltreatment reporting: revisiting the myth of classlessness. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1998;68:295–304. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
69. Sedlak AJ, Broadhurst DD. Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1996. Google Scholar
70. Poe-Yamagata M, Jones E. Juvenile Arrests 1998. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2000. Google Scholar
71. van Ryn M, Burke J. The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians’ perceptions of patients. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:813–828. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
72. Moskowitz GB, ed. Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. Google Scholar
73. Stangor C, ed. Stereotypes and Prejudice. Philadelphia, Pa: Psychology Press; 2001. Google Scholar
74. Kunda Z, Sherman-Williams B. Stereotypes and the construal of individuating information. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1993;19:90–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
75. Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV. Social cognition: categorical person perception. Br J Psychol. 2001;92:239–255. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
76. Hamilton DL. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1981. Google Scholar
77. Kunda Z. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1999. Google Scholar
78. Macrae CN, Milne AB, Bodenhausen GV. Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: a peek inside the cognitive toolbox. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66:33–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
79. Hamilton DL, Trolier TK. Stereotypes and stereotyping: an overview of the cognitive approach. In: Dovidio JF, Gaetner SL, eds. Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press Inc; 1986:127–163. Google Scholar
80. Andersen SM, Klatzky RL, Murray J. Traits and social stereotypes: efficiency differences in social information processing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59:192–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
81. Bargh JA, Chaiken S, Govender R, Pratto F. The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;62:893–912. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
82. Blair I. Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In: Moskowitz G, ed. Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; [[6]] 2001. Google Scholar
83. Vassiliou V, Trandis H, Vassiliou G, McGuire H. Interpersonal contact and stereotyping. In: Triandis H, ed. The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; [[7]] 1972. Google Scholar
84. Lalonde RN, Gardner RC. The intergroup perspective on stereotype organization and processing. Br J Soc Psychol. 1989;28:289–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
85. Gilbert DT, Hixon JG. The trouble of thinking: activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60:509–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
86. Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV, Schloerscheidt AM, Milne AB. Tales of the unexpected: executive function and person perception. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76:200–213. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
87. Monteith M, Voils C. Control over prejudice. In: Moskowitz G, ed. Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; [[8]] 2001. Google Scholar
88. Pratto F, Bargh JA. Stereotyping based on apparently individuating information: trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1991;27:26–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
89. Gerbert B. Perceived likeability and competence of simulated patients: influence on physicians’ management plans. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18:1053–1059. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
90. Tobin JN, Wasserheil-Smoller S, Wexler JP, et al. Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:19–25. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
91. Hall JA, Epstein AM, DeCiantis ML, McNeil BJ. Physicians’ liking for their patients: more evidence for the role of affect in medical care. Health Psychol. 1993;12:140–146. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
92. Kearney N, Miller M, Paul J, Smith K. Oncology healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward elderly people. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:599–601. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
93. Like R, Zyzanski SJ. Patient satisfaction with the clinical encounter: social psychological determinants. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24:351–357. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
94. Revenson TA. Compassionate stereotyping of elderly patients by physicians: revising the social contact hypothesis. Psychol Aging. 1989;4:230–234. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
95. Stern M, Arenson E. Childhood cancer stereotype: impact on adult perceptions of children. J Pediatr Psychol. 1989;14:593–605. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
96. Stern M, Moritzen SK, Carmel S, Olexa-Andrews M. The prematurity stereotype in Israeli health care providers. Med Educ. 2001;35:129–133. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
97. Stern M, Ross S, Bielass M. Medical students’ perceptions of children: modifying a childhood cancer stereotype. J Pediatr Psychol. 1991;16:27–38. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
98. Kelly CE. Bringing homophobia out of the closet: antigay bias within the patient-physician relationship. Pharos. 1992;55:2–8. Google Scholar
99. Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Smith S, Hood HV, Cook DJ. Medical students’ attitudes toward AIDS and homosexual patients. J Med Educ. 1987;62:549–556. MedlineGoogle Scholar
100. Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Smith S Jr., Hood HV, Cook DJ. Stigmatization of AIDS patients by physicians. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:789–791. LinkGoogle Scholar
101. Seils DM, Friedman JY, Schulman KA. Sex differences in the referral process for invasive cardiac procedures. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2001;56:151–154, 160. MedlineGoogle Scholar
102. Ryan CS, Robinson DR, Hausmann LR. Stereotyping among providers and consumers of public mental health services: the role of perceived group variability. Behav Modif. 2001;25:406–442. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
103. Ganong LH, Coleman M, Riley C. Nursing students’ stereotypes of married and unmarried pregnant clients. Res Nurs Health. 1988;11:333–342. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
104. Bowler IM. Stereotypes of women of Asian descent in midwifery: some evidence. Midwifery. 1993;9:7–16. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
105. Thomson A. The use of stereotypes in the provision of midwifery care. Midwifery. 1993;9:1–2. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
106. Porter JR, Beuf AH. The effect of a racially consonant medical context on adjustment of African-American patients to physical disability. Med Anthropol. 1994;16:1–16. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
107. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–626. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
108. Rathore SS, Lenert LA, Weinfurt KP, et al. The effects of patient sex and race on medical students’ ratings of quality of life. Am J Med. 2000;108:561–566. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
109. Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV. Social cognition: thinking categorically about others. Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:93–120. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
110. Duncan B. Differential social perception and attribution. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;34:22–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
111. Darley JG. A hypothesis confirming bias in labeling effects. In: Stangor C, ed. Sterotypes and Prejudice. Ann Arbor, Mich: Psychology Press; [[9]] 2000. Google Scholar
112. Lepore L, Brown R. Category and stereotype activation: is prejudice inevitable? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72:275–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
113. Sagar H, Schofield J. Racial and behavioral cues in black and white children’s perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:590–598. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
114. Locksley A, Hepburn C, Ortiz V. Social stereotypes and judgements of individuals: an instance of the base-rate fallacy. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1982;18:23–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
115. Darley JG. A hypothesis confirming bias in labeling effects. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44:20–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
116. Burk JP, Sher KJ. Labeling the child of an alcoholic: negative stereotyping by mental health professionals and peers. J Stud Alcohol. 1990;51:156–163. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
117. Martin TW. White therapists’ differing perceptions of black and white adolescents. Adolescence. 1993;28:281–289. MedlineGoogle Scholar
118. Bogart LM, Kelly JA, Catz SL, Sosman JM. Impact of medical and nonmedical factors on physician decision making for HIV/AIDS antiretroviral treatment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;23:396–404. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
119. Bogart LM, Catz SL, Kelly JA, Benotsch EG. Factors influencing physicians’ judgments of adherence and treatment decisions for patients with HIV disease. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:28–36. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
120. van Ryn M, Hannan E, Burke J, Besculides M. An Examination of Factors Associated With Physician Recommendation for Revascularization. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1999. Google Scholar
121. Balsa AI, McGuire TG. Statistical discrimination in health care. J Health Econ. 2001;20:881–907. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
122. Chin MH, Humikowski CA. When is risk stratification by race or ethnicity justified in medical care? Acad Med. 2002;77:202–208. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
123. McKinlay JB, Potter DA, Feldman HA. Non-medical influences on medical decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:769–776. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
124. 10 Years of Reporting: Child Maltreatment, 1999. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1999. Google Scholar
125. Chen M, Bargh JA. Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: the self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation processes. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1997;33:541–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
126. Word C, Zanna M, Cooper J. The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophesies in interracial interaction. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1974;10:109–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
127. Jussim L. Self-fulfilling prophecies: a theoretical and integrative review. Psychol Rev. 1986;93:429–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
128. Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision-making style: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995;33:1176–1187. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
129. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583–589. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
130. [[10]] Roter DL, Moira PhD; Putnam, Samuel M. MD; Lipkin, Mack Jr, MD; Stiles, William PhD; Inui, Thomas S. MD. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277:350–356. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
131. Epstein AM, Taylor WC, Seage GR. Effects of patients’ socioeconomic status and physicians’ training and practice on patient-doctor communication. Am J Med. 1985;78:101–106. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
132. Epstein A, Ayanian J. Racial disparities in medical care. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1471–1473. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
133. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Caldwell E, Greenlee H, Collier AC. The quality of patient-doctor communication about end-of-life care: a study of patients with advanced AIDS and their primary care clinicians. AIDS. 1999;13:1123–1131. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
134. Hooper EM, Comstock LM, Goodwin JM, Goodwin JS. Patient characteristics that influence physician behavior. Med Care. 1982;20:630–638. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
135. Wissow LS, Roter DL, Wilson ME. Pediatrician interview style and mothers’ disclosure of psychosocial issues. Pediatrics. 1994;93:289–295. MedlineGoogle Scholar
136. Widdershoven GA. The doctor-patient relationship as a Gadamerian dialogue: a response to Arnason. Med Health Care Philos. 2000;3:25–27. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
137. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physicianpatient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27(suppl 3):S110–S127. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
138. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr., Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:448–457. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
139. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–528. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
140. Borum ML, Lynn J, Zhong Z. The effects of patient race on outcomes in seriously ill patients in SUPPORT: an overview of economic impact, medical intervention, and end-of-life decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(suppl 5):S194–S198. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
141. Mouton C, Teno JM, Mor V, Piette J. Communication of preferences for care among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: barriers to informed decisions? Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:342–347. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
142. Haas JS, Weissman JS, Cleary PD, Goldberg J, Gatsonis C, Seage GR. Discussion of preferences for life-sustaining care by persons with AIDS: predictors of failure in patient-physician communication. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1241–1248. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
143. Doescher MP, Saver BG. Physicians’ advice to quit smoking: the glass remains half empty. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:543–547. MedlineGoogle Scholar
144. Taira DA, Safran DG, Seto TB, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR. The relationship between patient income and physician discussion of health risk behaviors. JAMA. 1997;278:1412–1417. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
145. O’Malley MS, Earp JA, Harris RP. Race and mammography use in two North Carolina counties. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:782–786. LinkGoogle Scholar
146. O’Malley MS, Earp JA, Hawley ST, Schell MJ, Mathews HF, Mitchell J. The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening? Am J Public Health. 2001;91:49–54. LinkGoogle Scholar
147. Kogan MD, Kotelchuck M, Alexander GR, Johnson WE. Racial disparities in reported prenatal care advice from health care providers. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:82–88. LinkGoogle Scholar
148. Krupat E, Irish JT, Kasten LE, et al. Patient assertiveness and physician decision-making among older breast cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:449–457. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
149. Betancourt L, Fischer R, Giannetta J, Malmud E, Brodsky NL, Hurt H. Problem-solving ability of inner-city children with and without in utero cocaine exposure. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1999;20:418–424. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
150. Green AR, Carrillo JE, Betancourt JR. Why the disease-based model of medicine fails our patients. West J Med. 2002;176:141–143. MedlineGoogle Scholar
151. Green AR, Betancourt JR, Carrillo JE. Integrating social factors into cross-cultural medical education. Acad Med. 2002;77:193–197. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar


No related items




Michelle van Ryn, PhD, MPH, and Steven S. Fu, MD, MSCEMichelle van Ryn is with the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Department of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis. Steven S. Fu is with the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Section of General Internal Medicine, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota. “Paved With Good Intentions: Do Public Health and Human Service Providers Contribute to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health?”, American Journal of Public Health 93, no. 2 (February 1, 2003): pp. 248-255.

PMID: 12554578