Inorganic arsenic is naturally occurring in groundwaters throughout the United States. This study investigated arsenic exposure and self-report of 9 chronic diseases. We received private well-water samples and questionnaires from 1185 people who reported drinking their water for 20 or more years. Respondents with arsenic levels of 2 μg/L or greater were statistically more likely to report a history of depression, high blood pressure, circulatory problems, and bypass surgery than were respondents with arsenic concentrations less than 2 μg/L.

Inorganic arsenic is commonly found in groundwaters throughout the United States. In October 2001, the US Environmental Protection Agency reduced the maximum contaminant level drinking water standard for arsenic from 50 μg/L to 10 μg/L. By 2006, all public drinking water supplies in the United States are required to comply with the new standard. This new standard is based on existing epidemiological evidence documenting the association between arsenic exposure and cancers of the lung and bladder. The health effects associated with inorganic arsenic exposure are numerous and include basal cell cancer of the skin; tumors of the bladder, kidney, liver, and lung1–4; blood vessel damage5; peripheral vascular and cardiovascular disease4,6–8; numbness in the hands and feet9,10; and diabetes mellitus.11,12

Many studies have documented associations between arsenic exposure and chronic illness; however, most have focused on high exposures and cancers.2,4,5,13–15 Less studied have been the effects of low-level arsenic exposure.

In 1987, a groundwater study conducted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources identified arsenic in groundwater above the maximum contaminant level coincident with a bedrock layer at the interface of the St. Peter Sandstone and Sinnippee Dolomite. The geologic formation exists beneath more than 20 000 private water supply wells throughout several Wisconsin counties. Water samples collected from 1943 private wells between 1992 and 1993 contained arsenic concentrations that ranged from less than 2 μg/L to 12 000 μg/L. Nearly 20% of the water samples contained concentrations that exceeded the new federal drinking water standard of 10μg/L.16

The principal objective of this research was to evaluate the prevalence of 9 different chronic diseases in adults who drink water from privately owned wells in the at-risk area.

Between July 2000 and January 2002, 19 townships in the arsenic-contaminated area sponsored well-water testing programs to promote arsenic awareness and remediation options. All township homeowners were eligible and encouraged to obtain a well-water sample kit from the local town hall. A survey, which contained questions about lifetime residential history, usual drinking water consumption, use of water-treatment systems, and family health status, was included in the kit. The homeowners’ collected water sample and completed surveys were returned to the town hall for analysis. All the surveys were returned before the homeowners received the results of their water tests.

At the completion of the awareness campaign (approximately 1 month after all samples were returned), homeowners were invited to an informational meeting at the local town hall. During this meeting, they received the results of their well-water tests and were given the opportunity to ask state experts questions.

Data from the surveys were analyzed with SAS, Version 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Arsenic water concentrations were grouped into 3 strata (< 2 μg/L, 2–10 μg/L, > 10 μg/L). Analysis was limited to those aged 35 years or older who reported drinking their well water for 20 or more years. To evaluate the magnitude of any association between arsenic water concentrations and chronic disease status, multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

The mean age of the 1185 respondents who met our inclusion criteria was 62 years (SD = 12 years). The respondents reported drinking their well water for 20 to 83 years (mean = 30 years; SD = 10 years). The arsenic water concentrations ranged from 0 μg/L to 2389 μg/L, with a median of 2 μg/L. Most (84%) of the water samples had arsenic concentrations of 10 μg/L or less.

The results of the logistic regression analysis are shown in Table 1. Individuals with wells in the mid strata of arsenic concentrations (between 2 μg/L and 10 μg/L) were significantly more likely to report having depression than were respondents in the lowest strata (arsenic concentrations < 2 μg/L) (adjusted OR = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.14, 6.63). Additionally, respondents with well-water arsenic concentrations greater than 10 μg/L were significantly more likely to report having had cardiac bypass surgery, high blood pressure, and circulatory problems than were respondents whose well water had arsenic concentrations less than 2μg/L.

Our study is consistent with other studies that have found an association between arsenic exposure and cardiac disease,4,6–8,17 but the association between arsenic water concentration and depression is novel and merits further investigation. Only a few studies have evaluated the effect of arsenic exposure on brain function.18–20 Calderon et al.18 found that arsenic exposure is associated with lower verbal IQ and poorer long-term memory in children. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry17 has stated that acute toxic exposures to inorganic arsenic have been shown to lead to emotional lability and memory loss. A mechanism of action has not been identified, but perhaps long-term exposure to arsenic may interfere with the neurotransmitters associated with depression. Mechanistic research into effects on the brain and mental development is needed to understand the role arsenic may play in the development of neurological disease.

Caution in interpretation of our results is warranted because the health data are self-reported and not verified by medical record review. Also, we did not know the arsenic levels in the homeowner’s drinking water over the entire period of more than 20 years or how much arsenic was actually ingested. We assumed that our arsenic water concentration strata assignment was a reasonable surrogate for exposure and would have remained constant over the period. The possibility of other co-minerals and metals in the water samples contributing to health outcomes was not evaluated.

Table
TABLE 1— Associations Between Reported Chronic Illness and Arsenic (As) Exposure
TABLE 1— Associations Between Reported Chronic Illness and Arsenic (As) Exposure
 2 μg/L ≤As ≤10 μg/LAs > 10 μg/L
Reported Chronic IllnessCrude OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)a,bCrude OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)a,b
Bypass1.54 (0.84, 2.82)1.77 (0.95, 3.30)1.91 (0.94, 3.87)2.34 (1.12, 4.90)*
Angina2.05 (0.85, 4.90)2.27 (0.92, 5.59)1.04 (0.28, 3.90)1.07 (0.28, 4.07)
Heart disease1.31 (0.87, 1.97)1.52 (1.00, 2.35)1.30 (0.78, 2.17)1.54 (0.90, 2.68)
Heart attack1.19 (0.63, 2.23)1.31 (0.70, 2.50)1.83 (0.91, 3.68)2.08 (1.10, 4.31)*
High blood pressure1.09 (0.80, 1.50)1.15 (0.82, 1.59)1.57 (1.10, 2.31)*1.68 (1.13, 2.49)*
Stroke0.85 (0.37, 1.93)0.93 (0.40, 2.14)1.18 (0.46, 3.06)1.53 (0.60, 4.07)
Circulatory problems1.22 (0.56, 2.62)1.31 (0.60, 2.86)2.38 (1.10, 5.26)*2.64 (1.17, 5.95)*
Type 2 diabetes mellitus1.29 (0.75, 2.20)1.35 (0.78, 2.33)1.10 (0.50, 2.10)1.02 (0.49, 2.15)
Depression2.70 (1.12, 6.50)*2.74 (1.14, 6.63)*2.40 (0.90, 6.98)2.32 (0.80, 6.82)

Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

aReferent group = As < 2 μg/L.

bAdjusted for gender, age, smoking status, and body mass index.

*Significant at P ≤.05.

References

1. Chen CJ, Wang CJ. Ecological correlation between arsenic level in well water and age-adjusted mortality from malignant neoplasms. Cancer Res. 1990;50: 5470–5474. MedlineGoogle Scholar
2. Chiou HY, Hsueh YM, Liaw KF, et al. Incidence of internal cancers and ingested inorganic arsenic: a seven-year follow-up study in Taiwan. Cancer Res.1995;55:1296–1300. MedlineGoogle Scholar
3. Tsuda T, Babazono A, Yamamoto E, et al. Ingested arsenic and internal cancer: a historical cohort study followed for 33 years. Am J Epidemiol.1995; 141:198–209. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
4. Wu MM, Kuo TL, Hwang YH, Chen CJ. Dose-response relation between arsenic concentration in well water and mortality from cancers and vascular diseases. Am J Epidemiol.1989;130:1123–1132. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
5. Tseng WP, Chen WY, Sung JL, Chen JS. A clinical study of Blackfoot disease in Taiwan: an epidemic of peripheral vascular disease. Memoirs Coll Med Natl Taiwan Univ. 1961;7:1–18. Google Scholar
6. Engel RR, Hopenhayn-Rich C, Receveur O, et al. Vascular effects of chronic arsenic exposure: a review. Epidemiol Rev.1994;16:184–209. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
7. Engel RR, Smith AH. Arsenic in drinking water and mortality from vascular disease: an ecologic analysis in 30 counties in the United States. Arch Environ Health.1994;49:418–427. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
8. Hertz-Picciotto I, Arrighi HM, Hu SW. Does arsenic exposure increase the risk for circulatory disease? Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:174–181. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
9. Donofrio PD, Wilbourn AJ, Albers JW, Rogers L, Salanga V, Greenberg HS. Acute arsenic intoxication presenting as Guillain-Barre-like syndrome. Muscle Nerve.1987;10:114–120. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
10. Murphy MJ, Lyon LW, Taylor JW. Subacute arsenic neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological observations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.1981;44: 896–900. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
11. Lai MS, Hsueh YM, Chen CJ, et al. Ingested inorganic arsenic and prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Am J Epidemiol.1994;139:484–492. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
12. Rahman M, Axelson O. Diabetes mellitus and arsenic exposure: a second look at case-control data from a Swedish copper smelter. Occup Environ Med.1995; 52:773–774. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
13. Borzsonyi M, Berecski A, Rudnai P, Sanady MC, Horvath A. Epidemiological studies on human subjects exposed to arsenic in drinking water in southeast Hungary. Arch Toxicol.1992;66:77–78. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
14. Cebrian ME, Albores A, Aquilar M, Blakely E. Chronic arsenic poisoning in the North of Mexico. Hum Toxicol.1983;2:121–133. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
15. Chakraborty AK, Saha KC. Arsenical dermatosis from tubewell water in West Bengal. Indian J Med Res.1987;85:326–334. MedlineGoogle Scholar
16. Stoll R, Burkell R, La Plant N. Naturally-Occurring Arsenic in Sandstone Aquifer Water Supply Wells of NE Wisconsin. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; 1995. WI Groundwater Research and Monitoring Project Summaries. Publication WI DNR PUBL-WR-423-95. Google Scholar
17. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Arsenic. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 2000. Google Scholar
18. Calderon J, Navarro ME, Jimenez-Capdeville ME, et al. Exposure to arsenic and lead and neuropsychological development in Mexican children. Environ Res.2001;85:69–76. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
19. Danan M, Dally S, Conso F. Arsenic-induced encephalopathy. Neurology.1984;34:1524. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
20. Saha JC, Diskshit AK, Bandyopadhyay M. A review of arsenic poisoning and its effects on human health. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol.1999;29: 281–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Related

No related items

TOOLS

SHARE

ARTICLE CITATION

Kristina M. Zierold, PhD, Lynda Knobeloch, PhD, and Henry Anderson, MDKristina M. Zierold is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia. Lynda Knobeloch and Henry Anderson are with the Wisconsin Division of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental Health, Madison. “Prevalence of Chronic Diseases in Adults Exposed to Arsenic-Contaminated Drinking Water”, American Journal of Public Health 94, no. 11 (November 1, 2004): pp. 1936-1937.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.11.1936

PMID: 15514231